TY - JOUR
T1 - Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Enabled Total Body Irradiation (VMAT-TBI)
T2 - Six-year Clinical Experience and Treatment Outcomes
AU - Zhang-Velten, Elizabeth Ren
AU - Parsons, David
AU - Lee, Pam
AU - Chambers, Eric
AU - Abdulrahman, Ramzi
AU - Desai, Neil B.
AU - Dan, Tu
AU - Wardak, Zabi
AU - Timmerman, Robert
AU - Vusirikala, Madhuri
AU - Patel, Prapti A
AU - Simms-Waldrip, Tiffany
AU - Aquino, Victor
AU - Koh, Andrew
AU - Tan, Jun
AU - Iqbal, Zohaib
AU - Zhang, You
AU - Reynolds Jr., Robert Ray
AU - Chiu, Tsuicheng
AU - Joo, Mindy
AU - Hrycushko, Brian
AU - Ouyang, Luo
AU - Lamphier, Richard
AU - Yan, Yulong
AU - Jiang, Steve B.
AU - Kumar, Kiran A.
AU - Gu, Xuejun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Total body irradiation is an important part of the conditioning regimens frequently used to prepare patients for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Volumetric-modulated arc therapy enabled total body irradiation (VMAT-TBI), an alternative to conventional TBI (cTBI), is a novel radiotherapy treatment technique that has been implemented and investigated in our institution. The purpose of this study is to (1) report our six-year clinical experience in terms of treatment planning strategy and delivery time and (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicities in our cohort of patients treated with VMAT-TBI. This is a retrospective single center study. Forty-four patients at our institution received VMAT-TBI and chemotherapy conditioning followed by allogeneic SCT between 2014 and 2020. Thirty-two patients (73%) received standard-dose TBI (12-13.2 Gy in 6-8 fractions twice daily), whereas 12 (27%) received low-dose TBI (2-4 Gy in one fraction). Treatment planning, delivery, and treatment outcome data including overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and toxicities were analyzed. The developed VMAT-TBI planning strategy consistently generated plans satisfying our dose constraints, with planning target volume coverage >90%, mean lung dose ∼50% to 75% of prescription dose, and minimal hotspots in critical organs. Most of the treatment deliveries were <100 minutes (range 33-147, mean 72). The median follow-up was 26 months. At the last follow-up, 34 of 44 (77%) of patients were alive, with 1- and 2-year OS of 90% and 79% and RFS of 88% and 71%, respectively. The most common grade 3+ toxicities observed were mucositis (31 patients [71%]) and nephrotoxicity (6 patients [13%]), both of which were deemed multifactorial in cause. Four patients (9%) in standard-dose cohort developed grade 3+ pneumonitis, with 3 cases in the setting of documented respiratory infection and only 1 (2%) deemed likely related to radiation alone. VMAT-TBI provides a safe alternative to cTBI. The dose modulation capability of VMAT-TBI may lead to new treatment strategies, such as simultaneous boost and further critical organ sparing, for better malignant cell eradication, immune suppression, and lower toxicities.
AB - Total body irradiation is an important part of the conditioning regimens frequently used to prepare patients for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Volumetric-modulated arc therapy enabled total body irradiation (VMAT-TBI), an alternative to conventional TBI (cTBI), is a novel radiotherapy treatment technique that has been implemented and investigated in our institution. The purpose of this study is to (1) report our six-year clinical experience in terms of treatment planning strategy and delivery time and (2) evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicities in our cohort of patients treated with VMAT-TBI. This is a retrospective single center study. Forty-four patients at our institution received VMAT-TBI and chemotherapy conditioning followed by allogeneic SCT between 2014 and 2020. Thirty-two patients (73%) received standard-dose TBI (12-13.2 Gy in 6-8 fractions twice daily), whereas 12 (27%) received low-dose TBI (2-4 Gy in one fraction). Treatment planning, delivery, and treatment outcome data including overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and toxicities were analyzed. The developed VMAT-TBI planning strategy consistently generated plans satisfying our dose constraints, with planning target volume coverage >90%, mean lung dose ∼50% to 75% of prescription dose, and minimal hotspots in critical organs. Most of the treatment deliveries were <100 minutes (range 33-147, mean 72). The median follow-up was 26 months. At the last follow-up, 34 of 44 (77%) of patients were alive, with 1- and 2-year OS of 90% and 79% and RFS of 88% and 71%, respectively. The most common grade 3+ toxicities observed were mucositis (31 patients [71%]) and nephrotoxicity (6 patients [13%]), both of which were deemed multifactorial in cause. Four patients (9%) in standard-dose cohort developed grade 3+ pneumonitis, with 3 cases in the setting of documented respiratory infection and only 1 (2%) deemed likely related to radiation alone. VMAT-TBI provides a safe alternative to cTBI. The dose modulation capability of VMAT-TBI may lead to new treatment strategies, such as simultaneous boost and further critical organ sparing, for better malignant cell eradication, immune suppression, and lower toxicities.
KW - IMRT-TBI
KW - TBI
KW - Total body irradiation
KW - VMAT-TBI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121998129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85121998129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.020
DO - 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.10.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 34775145
AN - SCOPUS:85121998129
SN - 2666-6375
VL - 28
SP - 113.e1-113.e8
JO - Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
JF - Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
IS - 2
ER -