TY - JOUR
T1 - Using RBANS to characterize cognitive treatment response in autoimmune encephalopathy
AU - Kelley, Brendan J.
AU - Bratt, Robin
AU - Lobue, Christian
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Robert Bornstein, Ph.D. whose advice and review of this work was invaluable.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Introduction: Autoimmune encephalopathy (AE) is an increasingly recognized cause of cognitive impairment. This study investigates the use of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) to characterize treatment response of AE cognitive symptoms in ambulatory clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 29 consecutive patients treated for AE at the University of Cincinnati Memory Disorders Clinic. All patients underwent RBANS before treatment and 4–5 weeks after treatment. The Reliable Change index and clinically meaningful improvement method were used to determine if changes in RBANS performance were clinically significant. Results: Clinically meaningful improvement was seen in 20 out of 29 (69 %) subjects on one or more RBANS domains and in 13 patients (45 %) for the global RBANS index. Measured improvement on one or more cognitive domain scores showed excellent agreement with clinical impression of change. Conclusion: The RBANS provided an efficient and effective means to document cognitive outcomes and treatment response in AE. The brief administration time, availability of normative data, and alternate versions make the RBANS useful in clinical practice and in clinical research related to AE.
AB - Introduction: Autoimmune encephalopathy (AE) is an increasingly recognized cause of cognitive impairment. This study investigates the use of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) to characterize treatment response of AE cognitive symptoms in ambulatory clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective evaluation of 29 consecutive patients treated for AE at the University of Cincinnati Memory Disorders Clinic. All patients underwent RBANS before treatment and 4–5 weeks after treatment. The Reliable Change index and clinically meaningful improvement method were used to determine if changes in RBANS performance were clinically significant. Results: Clinically meaningful improvement was seen in 20 out of 29 (69 %) subjects on one or more RBANS domains and in 13 patients (45 %) for the global RBANS index. Measured improvement on one or more cognitive domain scores showed excellent agreement with clinical impression of change. Conclusion: The RBANS provided an efficient and effective means to document cognitive outcomes and treatment response in AE. The brief administration time, availability of normative data, and alternate versions make the RBANS useful in clinical practice and in clinical research related to AE.
KW - Autoimmune encephalitis
KW - Autoimmune encephalopathy
KW - Hashimoto encephalopathy
KW - RBANS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139312356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139312356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107438
DO - 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107438
M3 - Article
C2 - 36209517
AN - SCOPUS:85139312356
SN - 0303-8467
VL - 222
JO - Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
JF - Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
M1 - 107438
ER -