TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in Utilization and Cost of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapies among Medicare Beneficiaries
T2 - An Analysis from the Medicare Part D Database
AU - Sumarsono, Andrew
AU - Lalani, Hussain S.
AU - Vaduganathan, Muthiah
AU - Navar, Ann Marie
AU - Fonarow, Gregg C.
AU - Das, Sandeep R.
AU - Pandey, Ambarish
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Vaduganathan has received grants from Harvard Catalyst and Amgen as well as personal fees for consulting from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Baxter HealthCare, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, and Relypsa. Dr Navar has received personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Esperion Therapeutics, Amarin, Sanofi, Regeneron, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, The Medicines Company, New Amsterdam, and Pfizer as well as personal fees from Amgen, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Amarin, Sanofi, and Regeneron. Dr Fonarow has received personal fees for consulting from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Merck, and Novartis. Dr Pandey is supported by a Texas Health Resources scholarship and has served on the advisory board of Roche Diagnostics. No other disclosures were reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - Importance: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies are a cornerstone of prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. With the introduction of generic formulations and the release of new therapies, including proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, contemporary Medicare utilization of these therapies remains unknown. Objective: To determine trends in utilization and spending on brand-name and generic LDL-C-lowering therapies and to estimate potential savings if all Medicare beneficiaries were switched to available therapeutically equivalent generic formulations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed prescription drug utilization and cost trend data from the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event data set from 2014 to 2018 for LDL-C-lowering therapies. A total of 11 LDL-C-lowering drugs with 25 formulations, including 16 brand-name and 9 generic formulations, were included. Data were collected and analyzed from October 2019 to June 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries, annual spending, and spending per beneficiary for all formulations. Results: The total number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries ranged from 37720840 in 2014 to 44249461 in 2018. The number of Medicare beneficiaries taking LDL-C-lowering therapies increased by 23% (from 20.5 million in 2014 to 25.2 million in 2018), while the associated Medicare expenditure decreased by 46% (from $6.3 billion in 2014 to $3.3 billion in 2018). Lower expenditure was driven by greater uptake of generic statin and ezetimibe and a concurrent rapid decline in the use of their brand-name formulations. Medicare spent $9.6 billion on brand-name statins and ezetimibe and could have saved $2.1 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, if brand-name formulations were switched to equivalent generic versions when available. The number of beneficiaries using PCSK9 inhibitors since their introduction in 2015 has been modest, although use has increased by 144% (from 25569 in 2016 to 62476 in 2018) and total spending has increased by 199% (from $164 million in 2016 to $491 million in 2018). Conclusions and Relevance: Between 2014 and 2018, LDL-C-lowering therapies were used by 4.8 million more Medicare beneficiaries annually, with an associated $3.0 billion decline in Medicare spending. This cost reduction was driven by the rapid transition from brand-name formulations to lower-cost generic formulations of statins and ezetimibe. Use of PCSK9 inhibitions, although low, increased over time and could have broad implications on future Medicare spending..
AB - Importance: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies are a cornerstone of prevention in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. With the introduction of generic formulations and the release of new therapies, including proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, contemporary Medicare utilization of these therapies remains unknown. Objective: To determine trends in utilization and spending on brand-name and generic LDL-C-lowering therapies and to estimate potential savings if all Medicare beneficiaries were switched to available therapeutically equivalent generic formulations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed prescription drug utilization and cost trend data from the Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Event data set from 2014 to 2018 for LDL-C-lowering therapies. A total of 11 LDL-C-lowering drugs with 25 formulations, including 16 brand-name and 9 generic formulations, were included. Data were collected and analyzed from October 2019 to June 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries, annual spending, and spending per beneficiary for all formulations. Results: The total number of Medicare Part D beneficiaries ranged from 37720840 in 2014 to 44249461 in 2018. The number of Medicare beneficiaries taking LDL-C-lowering therapies increased by 23% (from 20.5 million in 2014 to 25.2 million in 2018), while the associated Medicare expenditure decreased by 46% (from $6.3 billion in 2014 to $3.3 billion in 2018). Lower expenditure was driven by greater uptake of generic statin and ezetimibe and a concurrent rapid decline in the use of their brand-name formulations. Medicare spent $9.6 billion on brand-name statins and ezetimibe and could have saved $2.1 billion and $0.4 billion, respectively, if brand-name formulations were switched to equivalent generic versions when available. The number of beneficiaries using PCSK9 inhibitors since their introduction in 2015 has been modest, although use has increased by 144% (from 25569 in 2016 to 62476 in 2018) and total spending has increased by 199% (from $164 million in 2016 to $491 million in 2018). Conclusions and Relevance: Between 2014 and 2018, LDL-C-lowering therapies were used by 4.8 million more Medicare beneficiaries annually, with an associated $3.0 billion decline in Medicare spending. This cost reduction was driven by the rapid transition from brand-name formulations to lower-cost generic formulations of statins and ezetimibe. Use of PCSK9 inhibitions, although low, increased over time and could have broad implications on future Medicare spending..
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091515763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091515763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3723
DO - 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.3723
M3 - Article
C2 - 32902560
AN - SCOPUS:85091515763
SN - 2380-6583
VL - 6
SP - 92
EP - 96
JO - JAMA Cardiology
JF - JAMA Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -