TY - JOUR
T1 - Trends in diagnostic imaging utilization among medicare and commercially insured adults from 2003 through 2016
AU - Hong, Arthur S.
AU - Levin, David
AU - Parker, Laurence
AU - Rao, Vijay M.
AU - Ross-Degnan, Dennis
AU - Wharam, J. Frank
N1 - Funding Information:
A.S.H. is supported by the Institutional National Research Service Award (T32HP12706), Ryoichi Sasakawa Fellowship Fund, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholar Program, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001105), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R24HS022418), and National Cancer Institute Cancer Center (1P30CA142543-03).
Funding Information:
A.S.H. Activities related to the pres- ent article: disclosed no relevant rela-tionships. Activities not related to the present article: spouse received com-pensation from Janssen and AbbVie for scientific advisory board and speaker bu-reau participation. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. D.L. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Ac-tivities not related to the present article: is a board member of Outpatient Imag-ing Affiliates; is a consultant for Health-Help. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. L.P. disclosed no relevant relationships. V.M.R. disclosed no relevant relationships. D.R.D. Activi-ties related to the present article: institu-tion received a grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Activities not related to the present article: is employed by the Department of Population Medicine. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships. J.F.W. Activities related to the present article: disclosed no relevant relationships. Activities not related to the present article: is employed by Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare. Other relationships: disclosed no relevant relationships.
Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2019.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Trends in noninvasive diagnostic imaging (NDI) utilization rates have predominantly been reported in Medicare enrollees. To the authors' knowledge, there has been no prior direct comparison of utilization rates between Medicare and commercially insured patients. Purpose: To analyze trends in NDI utilization rates by modality, comparing Medicare fee-for-service and commercially insured enrollees. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective trend analysis of NDI performed between 2003 and 2016 as reported in claims databases for all adults enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and for roughly 9 million commercially insured patients per year. The commercially insured patients were divided into two populations: Those aged 18-44 years and those aged 45-64 years. The same procedure code definitions for NDI were applied to both Medicare and commercial claims, rates were calculated per 1000 enrollees, and trends were reported over time in aggregate followed by modality (CT, MRI, nuclear imaging, echocardiography, US, radiography). Join-point regression was used to model annual rates and to identify statistically significant (P , .05) changes in trends. Results: In almost all instances, Medicare enrollees had the highest utilization rate for each modality, followed by commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years, then aged 18-44 years. All three populations showed utilization growth through the mid to late 2000s (images per 1000 enrollees per year for Medicare: 91 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 34, 148]; commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years: 158 [95% CI: 130, 186]; aged 18-44 years: 83 [95% CI: 69, 97]), followed by significant declining trends from the late 2000s through early 2010s (images per 1000 enrollees per year for Medicare: 2301 [95% CI: 2510, 292]; commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years: 254 [95% CI: 269, 239]; aged 18-44 years: 226 [95% CI: 231, 221]) coinciding with code-bundling events instituted by Medicare (CT, nuclear imaging, echocardiography). There were significant trend changes in modalities without code bundling (MRI, radiography, US), although flat trends mostly were exhibited. After the early 2010s, there were significant trend changes largely showing flat utilization growth. The notable exception was a significant trend change to renewed growth of CT imaging among commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years and Medicare enrollees after 2012, although at half the prior rate (images per 1000 enrollees per year for Medicare: 17 [95% CI: 6, 28]; commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years: 11 [95% CI: 2, 20]). Conclusion: Noninvasive diagnostic imaging utilization trends among commercially insured individuals are similar to those in Medicare enrollees, although at lower rates. Earlier rapid growth has ceased and, except for CT, utilization has stabilized since the early 2010s.
AB - Background: Trends in noninvasive diagnostic imaging (NDI) utilization rates have predominantly been reported in Medicare enrollees. To the authors' knowledge, there has been no prior direct comparison of utilization rates between Medicare and commercially insured patients. Purpose: To analyze trends in NDI utilization rates by modality, comparing Medicare fee-for-service and commercially insured enrollees. Materials and Methods: This study was a retrospective trend analysis of NDI performed between 2003 and 2016 as reported in claims databases for all adults enrolled in fee-for-service Medicare and for roughly 9 million commercially insured patients per year. The commercially insured patients were divided into two populations: Those aged 18-44 years and those aged 45-64 years. The same procedure code definitions for NDI were applied to both Medicare and commercial claims, rates were calculated per 1000 enrollees, and trends were reported over time in aggregate followed by modality (CT, MRI, nuclear imaging, echocardiography, US, radiography). Join-point regression was used to model annual rates and to identify statistically significant (P , .05) changes in trends. Results: In almost all instances, Medicare enrollees had the highest utilization rate for each modality, followed by commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years, then aged 18-44 years. All three populations showed utilization growth through the mid to late 2000s (images per 1000 enrollees per year for Medicare: 91 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 34, 148]; commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years: 158 [95% CI: 130, 186]; aged 18-44 years: 83 [95% CI: 69, 97]), followed by significant declining trends from the late 2000s through early 2010s (images per 1000 enrollees per year for Medicare: 2301 [95% CI: 2510, 292]; commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years: 254 [95% CI: 269, 239]; aged 18-44 years: 226 [95% CI: 231, 221]) coinciding with code-bundling events instituted by Medicare (CT, nuclear imaging, echocardiography). There were significant trend changes in modalities without code bundling (MRI, radiography, US), although flat trends mostly were exhibited. After the early 2010s, there were significant trend changes largely showing flat utilization growth. The notable exception was a significant trend change to renewed growth of CT imaging among commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years and Medicare enrollees after 2012, although at half the prior rate (images per 1000 enrollees per year for Medicare: 17 [95% CI: 6, 28]; commercially insured patients aged 45-64 years: 11 [95% CI: 2, 20]). Conclusion: Noninvasive diagnostic imaging utilization trends among commercially insured individuals are similar to those in Medicare enrollees, although at lower rates. Earlier rapid growth has ceased and, except for CT, utilization has stabilized since the early 2010s.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078517393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078517393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/radiol.2019191116
DO - 10.1148/radiol.2019191116
M3 - Article
C2 - 31891320
AN - SCOPUS:85078517393
SN - 0033-8419
VL - 294
SP - 342
EP - 350
JO - Radiology
JF - Radiology
IS - 2
ER -