Trauma Providers' Perceptions of Frailty Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs

Thomas H. Shoultz, Megan Moore, May J. Reed, Stephen J. Kaplan, Itay Bentov, Catherine Hough, Lisa A. Taitsman, Steven H. Mitchell, Grace E. So, Saman Arbabi, Herb Phelan, Tam Pham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations


Objectives Quality improvement in geriatric trauma depends on timely identification of frailty, yet little is known about providers' knowledge and beliefs about frailty assessment. This study sought to understand trauma providers' understanding, beliefs, and practices for frailty assessment. Methods We developed a 20-question survey using the Health Belief Model of health behavior and surveyed physicians, advanced practice providers, and trainees on the trauma services at a single institution that does not use formal frailty screening of all injured seniors. Results were analyzed via mixed methods. Results One hundred fifty-one providers completed the survey (response rate 92%). Respondents commonly included calendar age as an integral factor in their determinations of frailty but also included a variety of other factors, highlighting limited definitional consensus. Respondents perceived frailty as important to older adult patient outcomes, but assessment techniques were varied because only 24/151 respondents (16%) were familiar with current formal frailty assessment tools. Perceived barriers to performing a formal frailty screening on all injured older adults included the burdensome nature of assessment tools, insufficient training, and lack of time. When prompted for solutions, 20% of respondents recommended automation of the screening process by trained, dedicated team members. Conclusions Providers seem to recognize the impact that a diagnosis of frailty has on outcomes, but most lack a working knowledge of how to assess for frailty syndrome. Some providers recommended screening by designated, formally trained personnel who could notify decision makers of a positive screen result.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-163
Number of pages5
JournalSouthern medical journal
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019


  • frailty
  • geriatric
  • palliative
  • trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Trauma Providers' Perceptions of Frailty Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this