TY - JOUR
T1 - Total contact casts
T2 - Pressure reduction at ulcer sites and the effect on the contralateral foot
AU - Lavery, Lawrence A.
AU - Vela, Steven A.
AU - Lavery, David C.
AU - Quebedeaux, Terri L.
PY - 1997/11
Y1 - 1997/11
N2 - Objective: To compare the effectiveness of total contact casts with a cast boot (TCCB), total contact casts with a cast heel (TCCH), and therapeutic XtraDepth® shoes (XDS) to reduce ulcer site pressures and to determine if total contact casts increase contralateral pressures. Design: Repeat measure design with 40 replications nested within each treatment for each patient. Methods: Peak contralateral foot pressures and ulcer site pressures under the 1st metatarsal (1MET; n = 10), 2nd to 5th metatarsals (2- 5MET; n = 10), and great toe (GT; n = 5) were compared using the Novel-Pedar system and three treatments: TCCB, TCCH, and XDS. Baseline pressures were established using canvas oxfords. Results: There was no difference in pressure reduction with TCCH rs. TCCB for 1MET or GT ulcers, but TCCH reduced pressure better for 2-5MET ulcers (p < .001). Contralateral pressures were not elevated in either TCC group. Conclusions: TCCH were superior to TCCB in reducing 2-5MET ulcer pressures and equivalent to TCCB for 1MET and GT ulcers. Contralateral pressures are not increased by TCC use.
AB - Objective: To compare the effectiveness of total contact casts with a cast boot (TCCB), total contact casts with a cast heel (TCCH), and therapeutic XtraDepth® shoes (XDS) to reduce ulcer site pressures and to determine if total contact casts increase contralateral pressures. Design: Repeat measure design with 40 replications nested within each treatment for each patient. Methods: Peak contralateral foot pressures and ulcer site pressures under the 1st metatarsal (1MET; n = 10), 2nd to 5th metatarsals (2- 5MET; n = 10), and great toe (GT; n = 5) were compared using the Novel-Pedar system and three treatments: TCCB, TCCH, and XDS. Baseline pressures were established using canvas oxfords. Results: There was no difference in pressure reduction with TCCH rs. TCCB for 1MET or GT ulcers, but TCCH reduced pressure better for 2-5MET ulcers (p < .001). Contralateral pressures were not elevated in either TCC group. Conclusions: TCCH were superior to TCCB in reducing 2-5MET ulcer pressures and equivalent to TCCB for 1MET and GT ulcers. Contralateral pressures are not increased by TCC use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030778188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030778188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90342-7
DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90342-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 9365359
AN - SCOPUS:0030778188
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 78
SP - 1268
EP - 1271
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 11
ER -