Thromboembolism Following Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Case Series and Literature Review

Dane K. Wukich, Dana H. Waters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism following major orthopedic procedures of the hip and knee is well documented and patients are therefore routinely prophylaxed following these proximal lower extremity procedures. In contrast, foot and ankle surgery is considered by most health care professionals to be a low-risk procedure for the development of venous thromboembolism. As a result, pharmacologic deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is rarely administered. This postoperative practice is supported by the literature regarding deep venous thrombosis following foot and ankle surgery. In this article, we review the risk factors and explore the occurrence of thromboembolism after foot and ankle surgery in the literature. We also present our restrospective study of patients who developed venous thromboembolism after forefoot, midfoot, hindfoot, and ankle procedures. Over the course of 1.5 years, 4 of a consecutive series of 1000 patients (0.4%) developed a deep venous thrombolism and 3 of 1000 (0.3%) developed nonfatal pulmonary emboli. In our series, each of our patients who developed venous thromboembolism had at least 2 identifiable risk factors. The incidence of venous thromboembolism following foot and ankle surgery is rare (less than 1%), and the need for routine propylaxis postoperatively is not supported by any high level of evidence studies. Level of Clinical Evidence: 4.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-249
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2008

Keywords

  • deep venous thrombosis
  • prophylaxis
  • pulmonary embolism
  • venous thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thromboembolism Following Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Case Series and Literature Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this