TY - JOUR
T1 - Theories of bias in probability judgment
AU - Birnbaum, Michael H.
AU - Anderson, Carolyn J.
AU - Hynan, Linda G.
PY - 1990/1
Y1 - 1990/1
N2 - When psychologists study human judgments of probability, judged probabilities unfortunately do not conform to the equations of probability theory. Because probability theory offers such a convenient and compelling structure for discussing beliefs about ambiguous and uncertain events, many scholars have found it disturbing to think that humans might have been rational enough to invent probability theory but not rational enough to use it in their daily thought. This chapter will explore explanations of the discrepancies between judged probabilities and the implications of probability theory.
AB - When psychologists study human judgments of probability, judged probabilities unfortunately do not conform to the equations of probability theory. Because probability theory offers such a convenient and compelling structure for discussing beliefs about ambiguous and uncertain events, many scholars have found it disturbing to think that humans might have been rational enough to invent probability theory but not rational enough to use it in their daily thought. This chapter will explore explanations of the discrepancies between judged probabilities and the implications of probability theory.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956721407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956721407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61338-2
DO - 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61338-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77956721407
SN - 0166-4115
VL - 68
SP - 477
EP - 498
JO - Advances in Psychology
JF - Advances in Psychology
IS - C
ER -