TY - JOUR
T1 - The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions
AU - Deng, J.
AU - Pawlicki, T.
AU - Chen, Y.
AU - Li, J.
AU - Jiang, S. B.
AU - Ma, C. M.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10% of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (≥5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6% for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (≥5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (>5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5% of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (≤2 mm).
AB - We have investigated the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions for a Varian MLC. We have compared the dose distributions calculated using the intensity maps with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Our results showed that, for one intensity-modulated treatment field, the maximum tongue-and-groove effect could be up to 10% of the maximum dose in the dose distributions. For an IMRT treatment with multiple gantry angles (≥5), the difference between the dose distributions with and without the tongue-and-groove effect was hardly visible, less than 1.6% for the two typical clinical cases studied. After considering the patient setup errors, the dose distributions were smoothed with reduced and insignificant differences between plans with and without the tongue-and-groove effect. Therefore, for a multiple-field IMRT plan (≥5), the tongue-and-groove effect on the IMRT dose distributions will be generally clinically insignificant due to the smearing effect of individual fields. The tongue-and-groove effect on an IMRT plan with small number of fields (>5) will vary depending on the number of fields in a plan (coplanar or non-coplanar), the MLC leaf sequences and the patient setup uncertainty, and may be significant (>5% of maximum dose) in some cases, especially when the patient setup uncertainty is small (≤2 mm).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035055467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035055467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/310
DO - 10.1088/0031-9155/46/4/310
M3 - Article
C2 - 11324950
AN - SCOPUS:0035055467
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 46
SP - 1039
EP - 1060
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 4
ER -