TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect on Surgical Complications of Bevacizumab Added to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
T2 - NRG Oncology/NSABP Protocol B-40
AU - Bear, Harry D.
AU - Tang, Gong
AU - Rastogi, Priya
AU - Geyer, Charles E.
AU - Zoon, Christine K.
AU - Kidwell, Kelley M.
AU - Robidoux, André
AU - Baez-Diaz, Luis
AU - Brufsky, Adam M.
AU - Mehta, Rita S.
AU - Fehrenbacher, Louis
AU - Young, James A.
AU - Senecal, Francis M.
AU - Gaur, Rakesh
AU - Margolese, Richard G.
AU - Adams, Paul T.
AU - Gross, Howard M.
AU - Costantino, Joseph P.
AU - Paik, Soonmyung
AU - Swain, Sandra M.
AU - Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
AU - Wolmark, Norman
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by National Cancer Institute, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service Grants: U10-CA-108068, U10-CA-180822, NCI-44066-26(AR); UG1CA-189867, UM1-CA-189869(HDB), and UGI-CA-189853(RG) (NCORPs); and by Genentech, Inc., a full member of the Roche Group of companies; Roche Laboratories Inc.; Lilly Research Laboratories, a division of Eli Lilly & Company; and Precision Therapeutics, Inc. The authors also thank participating member sites as well as patients enrolled in the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Background: NRG Oncology/NSABP trial B-40 tested the impact of adding bevacizumab (bev) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Secondary endpoints included rates of surgical complications after surgery in patients who did or did not receive bev. Methods: A total of 1206 women with HER2-negative operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of three different docetaxel-plus-anthracycline-based regimens, without or with bev (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for the first 6 of 8 cycles and for 10 doses postoperatively. Surgical complications were assessed from date of surgery through 24 months following study entry. Results: Early surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the bev group (25.4 vs. 18.9%; trend test p = 0.008), but most were grade 1–2. Early noninfectious wound dehiscences were infrequent and not significantly different (5.4 vs. 3.1%; trend test p = 0.15). Long-term noninfectious wound complications were significantly higher for patients receiving bev (11.8 vs. 5.1%; trend test p = 0.0007), but the incidence of grade ≥3 wound dehiscence was low in both groups (<1%). Among 193 patients undergoing expander or implant reconstructions, 19 (19.6%) of 97 in the bev-receiving group versus 10 (10.4%) of 96 in the non-bev group had grade ≥3 complications (Pearson, p = 0.11). Conclusions: Overall, adding bev increased surgical complications, but most serious complications were not significantly increased. In particular, the need for surgical intervention in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants was higher with bev but was not statistically significantly different. With precautions, bev can be used safely perioperatively in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer.
AB - Background: NRG Oncology/NSABP trial B-40 tested the impact of adding bevacizumab (bev) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer. Secondary endpoints included rates of surgical complications after surgery in patients who did or did not receive bev. Methods: A total of 1206 women with HER2-negative operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive one of three different docetaxel-plus-anthracycline-based regimens, without or with bev (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) for the first 6 of 8 cycles and for 10 doses postoperatively. Surgical complications were assessed from date of surgery through 24 months following study entry. Results: Early surgical complications were significantly more frequent in the bev group (25.4 vs. 18.9%; trend test p = 0.008), but most were grade 1–2. Early noninfectious wound dehiscences were infrequent and not significantly different (5.4 vs. 3.1%; trend test p = 0.15). Long-term noninfectious wound complications were significantly higher for patients receiving bev (11.8 vs. 5.1%; trend test p = 0.0007), but the incidence of grade ≥3 wound dehiscence was low in both groups (<1%). Among 193 patients undergoing expander or implant reconstructions, 19 (19.6%) of 97 in the bev-receiving group versus 10 (10.4%) of 96 in the non-bev group had grade ≥3 complications (Pearson, p = 0.11). Conclusions: Overall, adding bev increased surgical complications, but most serious complications were not significantly increased. In particular, the need for surgical intervention in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants was higher with bev but was not statistically significantly different. With precautions, bev can be used safely perioperatively in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995794031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995794031&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-016-5662-9
DO - 10.1245/s10434-016-5662-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 27864694
AN - SCOPUS:84995794031
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 24
SP - 1853
EP - 1860
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 7
ER -