TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of In-School Saccadic Training on Reading Fluency and Comprehension in First and Second Grade Students
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Dodick, David
AU - Starling, Amaal J.
AU - Wethe, Jennifer
AU - Pang, Yi
AU - Messner, Leonard V.
AU - Smith, Craig
AU - Master, Christina L.
AU - Halker-Singh, Rashmi B.
AU - Vargas, Bert B.
AU - Bogle, Jamie M.
AU - Mandrekar, Jay
AU - Talaber, Alexandra
AU - Leong, Danielle
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Efficient eye movements provide a physical foundation for proficient reading skills. We investigated the effect of in-school saccadic training on reading performance. In this cross-over design, study participants (n = 327, 165 males; mean age [SD]: 7 y 6 mo [1y 1 mo]) were randomized into treatment and control groups, who then underwent eighteen 20-minute training sessions over 5 weeks using King-Devick Reading Acceleration Program Software. Pre- and posttreatment reading assessments included fluency, comprehension, and rapid number naming performance. The treatment group had significantly greater improvement than the control group in fluency (6.2% vs 3.6%, P =.0277) and comprehension (7.5% vs 1.5%, P =.0002). The high-needs student group significantly improved in fluency (P <.001) and comprehension (P <.001). We hypothesize these improvements to be attributed to the repetitive practice of reading-related eye movements, shifting visuospatial attention, and visual processing. Consideration should be given to teaching the physical act of reading within the early education curriculum.
AB - Efficient eye movements provide a physical foundation for proficient reading skills. We investigated the effect of in-school saccadic training on reading performance. In this cross-over design, study participants (n = 327, 165 males; mean age [SD]: 7 y 6 mo [1y 1 mo]) were randomized into treatment and control groups, who then underwent eighteen 20-minute training sessions over 5 weeks using King-Devick Reading Acceleration Program Software. Pre- and posttreatment reading assessments included fluency, comprehension, and rapid number naming performance. The treatment group had significantly greater improvement than the control group in fluency (6.2% vs 3.6%, P =.0277) and comprehension (7.5% vs 1.5%, P =.0002). The high-needs student group significantly improved in fluency (P <.001) and comprehension (P <.001). We hypothesize these improvements to be attributed to the repetitive practice of reading-related eye movements, shifting visuospatial attention, and visual processing. Consideration should be given to teaching the physical act of reading within the early education curriculum.
KW - eye movements
KW - intervention
KW - randomized controlled trial
KW - reading
KW - saccadic training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006379781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006379781&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0883073816668704
DO - 10.1177/0883073816668704
M3 - Article
C2 - 28257277
AN - SCOPUS:85006379781
SN - 0883-0738
VL - 32
SP - 104
EP - 111
JO - Journal of Child Neurology
JF - Journal of Child Neurology
IS - 1
ER -