The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer

Samuel Amintas, Nicolas Giraud, Benjamin Fernandez, Charles Dupin, Quentin Denost, Aurelie Garant, Nora Frulio, Denis Smith, Anne Rullier, Eric Rullier, Te Vuong, Sandrine Dabernat, Véronique Vendrely

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Since total neoadjuvant treatment achieves almost 30% pathologic complete response, organ preservation has been increasingly debated for good responders after neoadjuvant treatment for patients diagnosed with rectal cancer. Two organ preservation strategies are available: a watch and wait strategy and a local excision strategy including patients with a near clinical complete response. A major issue is the selection of patients according to the initial tumor staging or the response assessment. Despite modern imaging improvement, identifying complete response remains challenging. A better selection could be possible by radiomics analyses, exploiting numerous image features to feed data characterization algorithms. The subsequent step is to include baseline and/or pre-therapeutic MRI, PET-CT, and CT radiomics added to the patients’ clinicopathological data, inside machine learning (ML) prediction models, with predictive or prognostic purposes. These models could be further improved by the addition of new biomarkers such as circulating tumor biomarkers, molecular profiling, or pathological immune biomarkers. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1507-1523
Number of pages17
JournalCurrent treatment options in oncology
Volume24
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Chemoradiotherapy
  • Non-operative management
  • Rectal brachytherapy
  • Rectal cancer
  • Rectal preservation
  • Response assessment
  • TRG

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this