TY - JOUR
T1 - The accuracy of artificial intelligence deformed nodal structures in cervical online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy
AU - Wang, Ethan
AU - Yen, Allen
AU - Hrycushko, Brian
AU - Wang, Siqiu
AU - Lin, Jingyin
AU - Zhong, Xinran
AU - Dohopolski, Michael
AU - Nwachukwu, Chika
AU - Iqbal, Zohaib
AU - Albuquerque, Kevin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Background and Purpose: Online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy (ART) adjusts for anatomical changes during external beam radiotherapy. However, limited cone-beam image quality complicates nodal contouring. Despite this challenge, artificial-intelligence guided deformation (AID) can auto-generate nodal contours. Our study investigated the optimal use of such contours in cervical online cone-beam-based ART. Materials and Methods: From 136 adaptive fractions across 21 cervical cancer patients with nodal disease, we extracted 649 clinically-delivered and AID clinical target volume (CTV) lymph node boost structures. We assessed geometric alignment between AID and clinical CTVs via dice similarity coefficient, and 95% Hausdorff distance, and geometric coverage of clinical CTVs by AID planning target volumes by false positive dice. Coverage of clinical CTVs by AID contour-based plans was evaluated using D100, D95, V100%, and V95%. Results: Between AID and clinical CTVs, the median dice similarity coefficient was 0.66 and the median 95 % Hausdorff distance was 4.0 mm. The median false positive dice of clinical CTV coverage by AID planning target volumes was 0. The median D100 was 1.00, the median D95 was 1.01, the median V100% was 1.00, and the median V95% was 1.00. Increased nodal volume, fraction number, and daily adaptation were associated with reduced clinical CTV coverage by AID-based plans. Conclusion: In one of the first reports on pelvic nodal ART, AID-based plans could adequately cover nodal targets. However, physician review is required due to performance variation. Greater attention is needed for larger, daily-adapted nodes further into treatment.
AB - Background and Purpose: Online cone-beam-based adaptive radiotherapy (ART) adjusts for anatomical changes during external beam radiotherapy. However, limited cone-beam image quality complicates nodal contouring. Despite this challenge, artificial-intelligence guided deformation (AID) can auto-generate nodal contours. Our study investigated the optimal use of such contours in cervical online cone-beam-based ART. Materials and Methods: From 136 adaptive fractions across 21 cervical cancer patients with nodal disease, we extracted 649 clinically-delivered and AID clinical target volume (CTV) lymph node boost structures. We assessed geometric alignment between AID and clinical CTVs via dice similarity coefficient, and 95% Hausdorff distance, and geometric coverage of clinical CTVs by AID planning target volumes by false positive dice. Coverage of clinical CTVs by AID contour-based plans was evaluated using D100, D95, V100%, and V95%. Results: Between AID and clinical CTVs, the median dice similarity coefficient was 0.66 and the median 95 % Hausdorff distance was 4.0 mm. The median false positive dice of clinical CTV coverage by AID planning target volumes was 0. The median D100 was 1.00, the median D95 was 1.01, the median V100% was 1.00, and the median V95% was 1.00. Increased nodal volume, fraction number, and daily adaptation were associated with reduced clinical CTV coverage by AID-based plans. Conclusion: In one of the first reports on pelvic nodal ART, AID-based plans could adequately cover nodal targets. However, physician review is required due to performance variation. Greater attention is needed for larger, daily-adapted nodes further into treatment.
KW - Adaptive Radiotherapy
KW - Artificial Intelligence
KW - Cone-beam CT
KW - Deformable Image Registration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185188485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85185188485&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100546
DO - 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100546
M3 - Article
C2 - 38369990
AN - SCOPUS:85185188485
SN - 2405-6316
VL - 29
JO - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
JF - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
M1 - 100546
ER -