Technical Nuances and Outcomes of Telescoping Pipeline Flow Diverters: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND: “Telescoping” multiple overlapping Pipeline Embolization Devices (PEDs; Medtronic) has increased their utility by allowing for more impermeable coverage and providing the ability to off-set landing zone sites and extend treatment constructs. OBJECTIVE: To consider the technical nuances and challenges of telescoping PEDs for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: Databases from 3 U.S. academic neurovascular centers were retrospectively queried to identify patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with multiple PED constructs. Data on patient and aneurysm characteristics, as well as outcomes including Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, modified Rankin Scale score, and complications, were gathered. RESULTS: Forty-six patients had 48 intracranial aneurysms treated, including 16 (33%) in whom placement of telescoping PEDs was planned. Fourteen (30%) patients presented with a ruptured aneurysm. Twenty-one aneurysms (44%) were treated with proximal extension, 13 (27%) with distal extension, and 14 (29%) with PED placement inside one another. Thirty (70%) patients had complete aneurysm occlusion at follow-up. Two (4%) patients had to be retreated. Three patients with unruptured and 1 with ruptured aneurysm had a permanent intraprocedural complication. We present descriptive cases illustrating PEDs that were placed inside one another, proximally, distally, and to improve wall apposition because of vessel tortuosity. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate a higher than expected complication rate that is likely because of the technical complexity of these cases. The case illustrations presented demonstrate the indications and challenging aspects of telescoping PEDs.