Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In clinical trials that are subject to noncompliance, the commonly used intention-to-treat estimand is valid as a causal effect of treatment assignment but is sensitive to the level of compliance. An alternative estimand, the complier average causal effect (CACE), measures the average effect of treatment received in the latent subset of subjects who would comply with either assigned treatment. Because the principal stratum of compliers can vary with the circumstances of the trial, CACE too depends on the compliance fraction. We propose a model in which an underlying latent proto-compliance interacts with trial characteristics to determine a subject's compliance behavior. When the latent compliance is independent of the individual treatment effect, the average causal effect is constant across compliance classes, and CACE is robust across trials and equal to the population average causal effect. We demonstrate the potential degree of sensitivity of CACE in a simulation study, an analysis of data from a trial of vitamin A supplementation in children, and a meta-analysis of trials of epidural analgesia in labor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInternational Journal of Biostatistics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • complier average causal effect
  • intention-to-treat
  • noncompliance
  • randomization
  • sensitivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of estimands in clinical trials with imperfect compliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this