TY - JOUR
T1 - Selective hepatic arterial embolization of grade IV and V blunt hepatic injuries
T2 - An extension of resuscitation in the nonoperative management of traumatic hepatic injuries
AU - Ciraulo, David L.
AU - Luk, Stephen
AU - Palter, Mark
AU - Cowell, Vernon
AU - Welch, John
AU - Cortes, Vicente
AU - Orlando, Rocco
AU - Banever, Thomas
AU - Jacobs, Lenworth
PY - 1998/8
Y1 - 1998/8
N2 - Background: Recognizing the significant mortality and complications inherent in the operative management of blunt hepatic injuries, hepatic arterial embolization was evaluated as a bridge between operative and nonoperative interventions in patients defined as hemodynamically stable only with continuous resuscitation. Methods: Seven of 11 patients with grade IV or V hepatic injuries identified by computed tomography underwent hepatic arterial embolization. A prospective evaluation of hepatic embolization based on subsequent hemodynamic parameters was assessed by matched-pair analysis. A summary of this study population's demographic data and outcomes is presented, including age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, computed tomography grade, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, transfusion requirements, complications, and mortality. Results: No statistical difference was demonstrated between pre- embolization and postembolization hemodynamics and volume requirements. After embolization, however, continuous resuscitation was successfully reduced to maintenance fluids. Hepatic embolization was the definitive therapy for all seven patients who underwent embolization. Conclusion: Results of this preliminary investigation suggest that hepatic arterial embolization is a viable alternative bridging the therapeutic options of operative and nonoperative intervention for a subpopulation of patients with hepatic injury.
AB - Background: Recognizing the significant mortality and complications inherent in the operative management of blunt hepatic injuries, hepatic arterial embolization was evaluated as a bridge between operative and nonoperative interventions in patients defined as hemodynamically stable only with continuous resuscitation. Methods: Seven of 11 patients with grade IV or V hepatic injuries identified by computed tomography underwent hepatic arterial embolization. A prospective evaluation of hepatic embolization based on subsequent hemodynamic parameters was assessed by matched-pair analysis. A summary of this study population's demographic data and outcomes is presented, including age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, computed tomography grade, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, transfusion requirements, complications, and mortality. Results: No statistical difference was demonstrated between pre- embolization and postembolization hemodynamics and volume requirements. After embolization, however, continuous resuscitation was successfully reduced to maintenance fluids. Hepatic embolization was the definitive therapy for all seven patients who underwent embolization. Conclusion: Results of this preliminary investigation suggest that hepatic arterial embolization is a viable alternative bridging the therapeutic options of operative and nonoperative intervention for a subpopulation of patients with hepatic injury.
KW - Hepatic arterial embolization
KW - Hepatic injury
KW - Nonoperative hepatic treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031710251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031710251&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199808000-00025
DO - 10.1097/00005373-199808000-00025
M3 - Article
C2 - 9715195
AN - SCOPUS:0031710251
SN - 1079-6061
VL - 45
SP - 353
EP - 359
JO - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
JF - Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
IS - 2
ER -