Scholarly Productivity and Rank in Academic Hospital Medicine

Andrew Sumarsono, Neil Keshvani, Sameh N. Saleh, Nathan Sumarsono, Mindy Tran, Maryam Warsi, Christiana Renner, Eugene S. Chu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite the rapid growth of academic hospital medicine, scholarly productivity remains poorly characterized. In this cross-sectional study, distribution of academic rank and scholarly output of academic hospital medicine faculty are described. We extracted data for 1554 hospitalists on faculty at the top 25 internal medicine residency programs. Only 11.7% of faculty had reached associate (9.0%) or full professor (2.7%). The median number of publications was 0.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.0-4.0), with 51.4% without a single publication. Faculty 6 to 10 years post residency had a median of 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-4.0) publication, with 46.8% of these faculty without a publication. Among men, 54.3% had published at least one manuscript, compared to 42.7% of women (P <.0001). Predictors of promotion included H-index, number of years post residency graduation, completion of chief residency, and graduation from a top 25 medical school. Promotion remains uncommon in academic hospital medicine, which may be partially due to low rates of scholarly productivity. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2021;16:545-548.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)545-548
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of hospital medicine
Volume16
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Leadership and Management
  • Fundamentals and skills
  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Scholarly Productivity and Rank in Academic Hospital Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this