TY - JOUR
T1 - Renal function outcomes following selective angioembolization for iatrogenic vascular lesions after partial nephrectomy
AU - Gahan, Jeffrey
AU - Gaitonde, Mansi
AU - Wadskier, Luis
AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A
AU - Trimmer, Clayton K
PY - 2013/12/1
Y1 - 2013/12/1
N2 - Purpose: To report one of the largest series of clinical and renal function outcomes of treated iatrogenic vascular lesions (IVL) after partial nephrectomy (PN). Angioembolization (AE) is the treatment of choice for patients with these lesions, but the additional renal injury conferred by this treatment has not been well described. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted PN from 2002 to 2012 were identified and those with AE were selected. Patients' charts were reviewed, and renal function was analyzed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification before and after PN and AE. Results: There were 849 patients who underwent PN and an IVL developed in 28 (3.3%). Twenty (71%) presented with gross hematuria at a mean of 10.2±7.7 days after PN and 8 (28%) needed transfusion. All patients had identifiable IVL at the time of selective AE, and technical success was achieved in 24/28 (86%), although 4 needed subsequent additional AE. The paired decrease in eGFR after PN was significant (P<0.01), while the paired change in eGFR after AE was not with either short-term (2.8 days) or intermediate-term (362 days) follow-up (P=0.50). Four patients experienced transient worsening in CKD classification after AE, although three experienced CKD stage improvement. Conclusion: Selective AE for IVL after PN is safe, efficacious, and does not lead to a significant impairment of renal function. It remains the preferred approach for the evaluation and management of post-PN hemorrhage.
AB - Purpose: To report one of the largest series of clinical and renal function outcomes of treated iatrogenic vascular lesions (IVL) after partial nephrectomy (PN). Angioembolization (AE) is the treatment of choice for patients with these lesions, but the additional renal injury conferred by this treatment has not been well described. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted PN from 2002 to 2012 were identified and those with AE were selected. Patients' charts were reviewed, and renal function was analyzed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification before and after PN and AE. Results: There were 849 patients who underwent PN and an IVL developed in 28 (3.3%). Twenty (71%) presented with gross hematuria at a mean of 10.2±7.7 days after PN and 8 (28%) needed transfusion. All patients had identifiable IVL at the time of selective AE, and technical success was achieved in 24/28 (86%), although 4 needed subsequent additional AE. The paired decrease in eGFR after PN was significant (P<0.01), while the paired change in eGFR after AE was not with either short-term (2.8 days) or intermediate-term (362 days) follow-up (P=0.50). Four patients experienced transient worsening in CKD classification after AE, although three experienced CKD stage improvement. Conclusion: Selective AE for IVL after PN is safe, efficacious, and does not lead to a significant impairment of renal function. It remains the preferred approach for the evaluation and management of post-PN hemorrhage.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890480301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890480301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/end.2013.0201
DO - 10.1089/end.2013.0201
M3 - Article
C2 - 24199730
AN - SCOPUS:84890480301
SN - 0892-7790
VL - 27
SP - 1516
EP - 1519
JO - Journal of Endourology
JF - Journal of Endourology
IS - 12
ER -