TY - JOUR
T1 - Relative impact of earlier diagnosis and improved treatment on survival for colorectal cancer
T2 - A US database study among elderly patients
AU - Tong, Liyue
AU - Ahn, Chul
AU - Symanski, Elaine
AU - Lai, Dejian
AU - Du, Xianglin L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the efforts of the National Cancer Institute in the creation of this database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibilities of the authors. This study was supported in part by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( R01-HS018956 ) and in part by a grant from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas ( RP130051 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Purposes: To estimate what proportion of improvement in relative survival was attributable to smaller stage/size due to early detection and what proportion was attributable to cancer chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) Methods: We studied 69,718 patients with CRC aged ≥66 years in 1992-2009 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registriesStudy periods were categorized into three periods according to the major changes or advances in screening and chemotherapy regimens: (1) Period-1 (1992-1995), during which there was no evidence-based recommendation for routine CRC screening and 5-fluorouracil was the mainstay for chemotherapy; (2) Period-2 (1996-2000), during which evidences and guidelines supported the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy for routine CRC screening; and (3) Period-3 (2001-2009), during which Medicare Program added the full coverage for colonoscopy screening to average-risk individuals, and several newly developed chemotherapy regimens were approvedOutcome variables included the likelihood of being diagnosed at an early stage or with a small tumor size, and improvement in relative survival Results: Compared to period-1, likelihood of being diagnosed with early stage CRC increased by 20% in period-2 (odds ratio=1.2, 95%CI: 1.1-1.2) and 30% in period-3 (1.3, 1.2-1.4); and likelihood of being diagnosed with small-size CRC increased by 60% in period-2 and 110% in period-3Similarly, 5-year overall relative survival increased from 51% in period-1 to 56% in period-2 and 60% in period-3Increase in survival attributable to migration in stage/size was 9% in period-2 and 20% in period-3, while the remaining survival improvement during period-2 and period-3 were largely attributable to more effective chemotherapy regimens (≥71.6%) and other treatment factors (≤25%) Conclusions: Improvements in CRC screening resulted in a migration of CRC toward earlier tumor stage and smaller size, which contributed to ≤20% of survival increaseSurvival improvement over the past 2 decades was largely explained by more effective chemotherapy regimens (≥71.6%)
AB - Purposes: To estimate what proportion of improvement in relative survival was attributable to smaller stage/size due to early detection and what proportion was attributable to cancer chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) Methods: We studied 69,718 patients with CRC aged ≥66 years in 1992-2009 from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registriesStudy periods were categorized into three periods according to the major changes or advances in screening and chemotherapy regimens: (1) Period-1 (1992-1995), during which there was no evidence-based recommendation for routine CRC screening and 5-fluorouracil was the mainstay for chemotherapy; (2) Period-2 (1996-2000), during which evidences and guidelines supported the use of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and sigmoidoscopy for routine CRC screening; and (3) Period-3 (2001-2009), during which Medicare Program added the full coverage for colonoscopy screening to average-risk individuals, and several newly developed chemotherapy regimens were approvedOutcome variables included the likelihood of being diagnosed at an early stage or with a small tumor size, and improvement in relative survival Results: Compared to period-1, likelihood of being diagnosed with early stage CRC increased by 20% in period-2 (odds ratio=1.2, 95%CI: 1.1-1.2) and 30% in period-3 (1.3, 1.2-1.4); and likelihood of being diagnosed with small-size CRC increased by 60% in period-2 and 110% in period-3Similarly, 5-year overall relative survival increased from 51% in period-1 to 56% in period-2 and 60% in period-3Increase in survival attributable to migration in stage/size was 9% in period-2 and 20% in period-3, while the remaining survival improvement during period-2 and period-3 were largely attributable to more effective chemotherapy regimens (≥71.6%) and other treatment factors (≤25%) Conclusions: Improvements in CRC screening resulted in a migration of CRC toward earlier tumor stage and smaller size, which contributed to ≤20% of survival increaseSurvival improvement over the past 2 decades was largely explained by more effective chemotherapy regimens (≥71.6%)
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Survival
KW - Tumor stage and size migration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84912127484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84912127484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.canep.2014.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.canep.2014.10.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 25454261
AN - SCOPUS:84912127484
SN - 1877-7821
VL - 38
SP - 733
EP - 740
JO - Cancer Epidemiology
JF - Cancer Epidemiology
IS - 6
ER -