TY - JOUR
T1 - Relationship between chest lateral width, tube current, image noise, and radiation exposure associated with coronary artery calcium scanning on 320-detector row CT
AU - Qian, Zhen
AU - Joshi, Parag H.
AU - Shaukat, Ayesha F.
AU - Laury, Torrance
AU - Kirkland, Ben
AU - Meyers, Lori
AU - Drew, Allison
AU - Angel, Erin
AU - Krivitsky, Eric
AU - Bajpai, Ambar
AU - Vazquez, Gustavo
AU - O'Rourke, Christian
AU - Carr, J. Jeffrey
AU - Rinehart, Sarah
AU - Voros, Szilard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2011/7/1
Y1 - 2011/7/1
N2 - Background: The relationship between chest lateral width, tube current, image noise, and radiation exposure on 320-detector row CT has not been reported. Objective: We investigated the relationships between chest lateral width, estimated radiation exposure (DLPe), and image noise in 300 patients undergoing clinical coronary calcium scanning. Methods: Patients undergoing coronary calcium scanning with 320-detector row CT (prospective, volumetric mode, 120 kV of tube voltage, 100–550 mA of tube current, 0.5-mm detector width) were grouped by chest lateral width (small, medium, and large) from anteroposterior topograms and 100 consecutive patients were selected from each group (n = 300). Tube current, DLPe, and noise were compared among groups with Kruskal-Wallis or one-way ANOVA. Phantom experiments were performed to evaluate the accuracy of calcium quantification as a function of size and tube current. Results: Median tube current in small, medium, and large patients was 130, 200, and 250 mA, respectively (P < 0.0001). Despite the use of higher tube current settings, noise levels also increased with size (20.2 ± 4.5 HU, 22.0 ± 3.9 HU, and 25.1 ± 4.9 HU, respectively; global P < 0.001]). DLPe was significantly higher with increasing size (54, 83, and 104 mGy · cm, respectively; P < 0.0001]). Phantom experiments showed that 50–100 mA, 150–200 mA, and approximately 300 mA in small, medium, and large phantoms were associated with stable estimate of calcium. Conclusions: Increasing chest lateral width is associated with increasing radiation exposure and image noise. The use of 50–100 mA in small and 150–200 mA in medium patients is associated with acceptable noise and stable estimate of coronary calcium scan. In large patients, precise identification of individual calcified lesions remains difficult despite increasing tube current and radiation exposure.
AB - Background: The relationship between chest lateral width, tube current, image noise, and radiation exposure on 320-detector row CT has not been reported. Objective: We investigated the relationships between chest lateral width, estimated radiation exposure (DLPe), and image noise in 300 patients undergoing clinical coronary calcium scanning. Methods: Patients undergoing coronary calcium scanning with 320-detector row CT (prospective, volumetric mode, 120 kV of tube voltage, 100–550 mA of tube current, 0.5-mm detector width) were grouped by chest lateral width (small, medium, and large) from anteroposterior topograms and 100 consecutive patients were selected from each group (n = 300). Tube current, DLPe, and noise were compared among groups with Kruskal-Wallis or one-way ANOVA. Phantom experiments were performed to evaluate the accuracy of calcium quantification as a function of size and tube current. Results: Median tube current in small, medium, and large patients was 130, 200, and 250 mA, respectively (P < 0.0001). Despite the use of higher tube current settings, noise levels also increased with size (20.2 ± 4.5 HU, 22.0 ± 3.9 HU, and 25.1 ± 4.9 HU, respectively; global P < 0.001]). DLPe was significantly higher with increasing size (54, 83, and 104 mGy · cm, respectively; P < 0.0001]). Phantom experiments showed that 50–100 mA, 150–200 mA, and approximately 300 mA in small, medium, and large phantoms were associated with stable estimate of calcium. Conclusions: Increasing chest lateral width is associated with increasing radiation exposure and image noise. The use of 50–100 mA in small and 150–200 mA in medium patients is associated with acceptable noise and stable estimate of coronary calcium scan. In large patients, precise identification of individual calcified lesions remains difficult despite increasing tube current and radiation exposure.
KW - Calcium
KW - Cardiac imaging
KW - Coronary artery
KW - MDCT
KW - Radiation dose
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055074780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055074780&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 21723514
AN - SCOPUS:80055074780
SN - 1934-5925
VL - 5
SP - 231
EP - 239
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
IS - 4
ER -