Regional Differences in Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Patients With Post–Sustained Virologic Response Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hidenori Toyoda, Mounika Kanneganti, Jonathan Melendez-Torres, Neehar D. Parikh, Prasun K. Jalal, Federico Piñero, Manuel Mendizabal, Ezequiel Ridruejo, Hugo Cheinquer, Andrea Casadei-Gardini, Arndt Weinmann, Markus Peck-Radosavljevic, Jean Francois Dufour, Pompilia Radu, Gamal Shiha, Riham Soliman, Shiv K. Sarin, Manoj Kumar, Jing Houng Wang, Pisit TangkijvanichWattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen, Masanori Atsukawa, Haruki Uojima, Akito Nozaki, Makoto Nakamuta, Koichi Takaguchi, Atsushi Hiraoka, Hiroshi Abe, Kentaro Matsuura, Tsunamasa Watanabe, Noritomo Shimada, Kunihiko Tsuji, Toru Ishikawa, Shigeru Mikami, Ei Itobayashi, Amit G. Singal, Philip J. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background & Aims: Widespread use of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus infection has been paralleled with increased numbers of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after achieving sustained virologic response (post-SVR HCC) worldwide. Few data compare regional differences in the presentation and prognosis of patients with post-SVR HCC. Methods: We identified patients with advanced fibrosis (F3/F4) who developed incident post-SVR HCC between March 2015 and October 2021 from 30 sites in Europe, North America, South America, the Middle East, South Asia, East Asia, and Southeast Asia. We compared patient demographics, liver dysfunction, and tumor burden by region. We compared overall survival by region using Kaplan–Meier analysis and identified factors associated with survival using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: Among 8796 patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis who achieved SVR, 583 (6.6%) developed incident HCC. There was marked regional variation in the proportion of patients detected by surveillance (range: 59.5%–100%), median maximum tumor diameter (range, 1.8–5.0 cm), and the proportion with multinodular HCC (range, 15.4%–60.8%). The prognosis of patients highly varied by region (hazard ratio range, 1.82–9.92), with the highest survival rates in East Asia, North America, and South America, and the lowest survival rates in the Middle East and South Asia. After adjusting for geographic region, HCC surveillance was associated with early stage detection (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A, 71.0% vs 21.3%; P <.0001) and lower mortality rates (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18–0.46). Conclusions: Clinical characteristics, including early stage detection, and prognosis of post-SVR HCC differed significantly across geographic regions. Surveillance utilization appears to be a high-yield intervention target to improve prognosis among patients with post-SVR HCC globally.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-80.e4
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Hepatitis C Virus Infection
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Prognosis
  • Surveillance
  • Sustained Virologic Response

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional Differences in Clinical Presentation and Prognosis of Patients With Post–Sustained Virologic Response Hepatocellular Carcinoma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this