Randomized trial comparing primidone initiation schedules for treating essential tremor

Padraig O'Suilleabhain, Richard B. Dewey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations


Early side effects are common when primidone is used to treat essential tremor, with as many as one-third of patients failing to tolerate the tablets. Lower doses can be prescribed initially using a suspension formulation. We suspected suspension initiation would result in fewer early side effects, allow better acclimatization, and improve compliance. Forty patients with essential tremor were randomized to begin primidone treatment using either 2.5 mg doses in the suspension form or 25 mg doses in the tablet form. Doses gradually increased over 3 weeks to 150 mg/day. This was a double-blind, double-dummy trial. Medication cessation due to side effects was designated the primary end-point. Four patients in the suspension group and two in the tablet group dropped out due to early side effects, resulting in a relative risk of 1.9 (95% confidence interval 0.4 to 9.2). Side effects in the first 48 hours of treatment were equally common, affecting seven subjects in each group. Treatment benefits were the same in both groups. We concluded that use of a very low initial dose and a graduated titration schedule in suspension formulation did not appear to improve primidone tolerability. If anything, compliance tended to be worse when compared with the tablet formulation, though the study was under-powered to reject the null hypothesis of equivalence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-386
Number of pages5
JournalMovement Disorders
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2002


  • Essential tremor
  • Primidone initiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized trial comparing primidone initiation schedules for treating essential tremor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this