Ramipril for the Treatment of COVID-19: RAMIC, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Daniel Q. Huang, Veeral Ajmera, Christian Tomaszewski, Andrew LaFree, Ricki Bettencourt, Wesley K. Thompson, Davey M. Smith, Atul Malhotra, Ravindra L. Mehta, Vaishal Tolia, Jeffrey Yin, Paul A. Insel, Stone Leachman, Jinho Jung, Summer Collier, Lisa Richards, Kristin Woods, Maral Amangurbanova, Archana Bhatt, Xinlian ZhangOana M. Penciu, Stuart Zarich, Tamrat Retta, Michelle S. Harkins, J. Pedro Teixeira, Brian Chinnock, Netanya S. Utay, Jordan E. Lake, Rohit Loomba

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Retrospective studies report that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) may reduce the severity of COVID-19, but prospective data on de novo treatment with ACEIs are limited. The RAMIC trial was a randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, allocation-concealed clinical trial to examine the efficacy of de novo ramipril versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19. Methods: Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, recruited from urgent care clinics, emergency departments, and hospital inpatient wards at eight sites in the USA. Participants were randomly assigned to daily ramipril 2.5 mg or placebo orally in a 2:1 ratio, using permuted block randomization. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, or invasive mechanical ventilation by day 14. Results: Between 27 May 2020 and 19 April 2021, a total of 114 participants (51% female) were randomized to ramipril (n = 79) or placebo (n = 35). The overall mean (± SD) age and BMI were 45 (± 15) years and 33 (± 8) kg/m2. Two participants in the ramipril group required ICU admission and one died, compared with none in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between ramipril and placebo in the primary endpoint (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or death) (3% versus 0%, p = 1.00) or adverse events (27% versus 29%, p = 0.82). The study was terminated early because of a low event rate and subsequent Emergency Use Authorization of therapies for COVID-19. Conclusion: De novo ramipril was not different compared with placebo in improving or worsening clinical outcomes from COVID-19 but appeared safe in non-critically ill patients with COVID-19. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04366050.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4805-4816
Number of pages12
JournalAdvances in Therapy
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Coronavirus
  • Ramipril
  • Therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ramipril for the Treatment of COVID-19: RAMIC, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this