TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiofrequency ablation of small renal cortical tumours in healthy adults
T2 - Renal function preservation and intermediate oncological outcome
AU - Stern, Joshua M.
AU - Gupta, Amit
AU - Raman, Jay D.
AU - Cost, Nicholas
AU - Lucas, Steven
AU - Lotan, Yair
AU - Raj, Ganesh
AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/9
Y1 - 2009/9
N2 - OBJECTIVES To present the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and oncological outcomes in a series of patients with cT1a renal cortical tumours treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a non-ischaemic minimally invasive ablative method, as nephron-sparing surgery gives excellent oncological outcomes and preserves renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS Healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA, I and II) patients with cT1a renal masses were identified, and clinical and radiographic data were reviewed to assess indications, complications, radiological evidence of disease recurrence, and renal function. Changes in GFR were calculated. Radiological recurrence was defined as any new enhancement (>10 Hounsfield units) after absence of enhancement on initial 6-week computed tomography. RESULTS Four patients were ASA I and 59 were ASA II; the median (range) age was 58 (20-84.6) years and the lesion diameter 2.1 (1-4.0) cm. Preoperative needle biopsy was diagnostic in 89% of patients, including 75% diagnostic of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). At a median (range) follow-up of 34 (1.0-80) months the renal preservation rate was 97%. One patient had a nephrectomy for biopsy-confirmed recurrence of RCC at 55 months; a second had a nephrectomy at 24 months for suspected radiographic recurrence, but had no evidence of disease on final pathology. A fifth (20%) of the patients had chronic kidney disease at the time of diagnosis. The median GFR before and after RFA was 76.3 and 74.3 mL/min/m2 (difference 2.0 mL/min/m2). CONCLUSION RFA might be a reasonable treatment choice for the healthy patient, with appropriate informed consent. Intermediate results suggest excellent oncological outcomes and preservation of renal function.
AB - OBJECTIVES To present the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and oncological outcomes in a series of patients with cT1a renal cortical tumours treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a non-ischaemic minimally invasive ablative method, as nephron-sparing surgery gives excellent oncological outcomes and preserves renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS Healthy (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA, I and II) patients with cT1a renal masses were identified, and clinical and radiographic data were reviewed to assess indications, complications, radiological evidence of disease recurrence, and renal function. Changes in GFR were calculated. Radiological recurrence was defined as any new enhancement (>10 Hounsfield units) after absence of enhancement on initial 6-week computed tomography. RESULTS Four patients were ASA I and 59 were ASA II; the median (range) age was 58 (20-84.6) years and the lesion diameter 2.1 (1-4.0) cm. Preoperative needle biopsy was diagnostic in 89% of patients, including 75% diagnostic of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). At a median (range) follow-up of 34 (1.0-80) months the renal preservation rate was 97%. One patient had a nephrectomy for biopsy-confirmed recurrence of RCC at 55 months; a second had a nephrectomy at 24 months for suspected radiographic recurrence, but had no evidence of disease on final pathology. A fifth (20%) of the patients had chronic kidney disease at the time of diagnosis. The median GFR before and after RFA was 76.3 and 74.3 mL/min/m2 (difference 2.0 mL/min/m2). CONCLUSION RFA might be a reasonable treatment choice for the healthy patient, with appropriate informed consent. Intermediate results suggest excellent oncological outcomes and preservation of renal function.
KW - Cell death
KW - NADH diaphorase
KW - Pathology
KW - RFA
KW - Renal cell carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69249125374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69249125374&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08443.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08443.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19426196
AN - SCOPUS:69249125374
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 104
SP - 786
EP - 789
JO - British Journal of Urology
JF - British Journal of Urology
IS - 6
ER -