Quality of care and outcomes for in-hospital ischemic stroke findings from the national get with the guidelines-stroke

Ethan Cumbler, Heidi Wald, Deepak L. Bhatt, Margueritte Cox, Ying Xian, Mathew Reeves, Eric E. Smith, Lee Schwamm, Gregg C. Fonarow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Purpose-Analysis of quality of care for in-hospital stroke has not been previously performed at the national level. This study compares patient characteristics, process measures of quality, and outcomes for in-hospital strokes with those for community-onset strokes in a national cohort. Methods-We performed a retrospective cohort study of the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-Stroke) database of The American Heart Association from January 2006 to April 2012, using data from 1280 sites that reported =1 in-hospital stroke. Patient characteristics, comorbid illnesses, medications, quality of care measures, and outcomes were analyzed for 21 349 in-hospital ischemic strokes compared with 928 885 community-onset ischemic strokes. Results-Patients with in-hospital stroke had more thromboembolic risk factors, including atrial fibrillation, prosthetic heart valves, carotid stenosis, and heart failure (P>0.0001), and experienced more severe strokes (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Score 9.0 versus 4.0; P>0.0001). Using GWTG-Stroke achievement measures, the proportion of patients with defect-free care was lower for in-hospital strokes (60.8% versus 82.0%; P>0.0001). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, patients with in-hospital strokes were less likely to be discharged home (adjusted odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence intervals [0.35-0.39]) or be able to ambulate independently at discharge (adjusted odds ratio 0.42; 95% confidence intervals [0.39-0.45]). In-hospital mortality was higher for in-hospital stroke (adjusted odds ratio 2.72; 95% confidence intervals [2.57-2.88]). Conclusions-Compared with community-onset ischemic stroke, patients with in-hospital stroke experienced more severe strokes, received lower adherence to process-based quality measures, and had worse outcomes. These findings suggest there is an important opportunity for targeted quality improvement efforts for patients with in-hospital stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-238
Number of pages8
JournalStroke
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Health care
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Quality indicators
  • Quality of health care
  • Registries
  • Stroke
  • Thrombolytic therapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of care and outcomes for in-hospital ischemic stroke findings from the national get with the guidelines-stroke'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this