TY - JOUR
T1 - Provider Attitudes and Practice Patterns for Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
AU - Rich, Nicole E.
AU - Yang, Ju Dong
AU - Perumalswami, Ponni V.
AU - Alkhouri, Naim
AU - Jackson, Whitney
AU - Parikh, Neehar D.
AU - Mehta, Neil
AU - Salgia, Reena
AU - Duarte-Rojo, Andres
AU - Kulik, Laura
AU - Rakoski, Mina
AU - Said, Adnan
AU - Oloruntoba, Omobonike
AU - Ioannou, George N.
AU - Hoteit, Maarouf A.
AU - Moon, Andrew M.
AU - Rangnekar, Amol S.
AU - Eswaran, Sheila L.
AU - Zheng, Elizabeth
AU - Jou, Janice H.
AU - Hanje, James
AU - Pillai, Anjana
AU - Hernaez, Ruben
AU - Wong, Robert
AU - Scaglione, Steven
AU - Samant, Hrishikesh
AU - Kapuria, Devika
AU - Chandna, Shaun
AU - Rosenblatt, Russell
AU - Ajmera, Veeral
AU - Frenette, Catherine T.
AU - Satapathy, Sanjaya K.
AU - Mantry, Parvez
AU - Jalal, Prasun
AU - John, Binu V.
AU - Fix, Oren K.
AU - Leise, Michael
AU - Lindenmeyer, Christina C.
AU - Flores, Avegail
AU - Patel, Nayan
AU - Jiang, Z. Gordon
AU - Latt, Nyan
AU - Dhanasekaran, Renumathy
AU - Odewole, Mobolaji
AU - Kagan, Sofia
AU - Marrero, Jorge A.
AU - Singal, Amit G.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding Andrew M. Moon’s research is in part supported by National Institutes of Health T32 DK007634 . Amit G. Singal’s research is in part supported by National Institutes of Health R01CA222900 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health .
Funding Information:
Funding Andrew M. Moon's research is in part supported by National Institutes of Health T32 DK007634. Amit G. Singal's research is in part supported by National Institutes of Health R01CA222900. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Conflicts of interest These authors disclose the following: Ponni Perumalswami has received grant support for research from Gilead. Naim Alkhouri is on speaker's bureau for Gilead, Exelixisi, Eisai, AbbVie, Salix, Intercept, Dova, Shionogi, and Alexion; served on advisory boards for Pfizer, Gilead, Intercept, Eisai, Exelixis, Dova, Shionogi, and Centurion; and received research funding from Gilead, Allergan, Intercept, Genfit, Cirius, Madrigal, Enyo, Inventiva, Hanmi, Novartis, BMS, and Enanta. Neehar Parikh serves as a consultant to Exelixis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; has served on advisory boards for Eisai, Exelixis, Wako, and Bayer; and received research funding from Bayer and Target Pharmasolutions. Neil Mehta has received research funding from Wako Diagnostics. Reena Salgia is on speaker's bureau for Bayer; and has served on advisory boards for Bayer, Eisai, and Exelixis. Laura Kulik is on speaker's bureau for Eisai, Gilead, and Dova; and serves as an advisory board member for BMS, Eisai, Bayer, and Exelixis. James Hanje is on speaker's bureau for Salix and Intercept; and served on advisory boards for Gilead. Anjana Pillai serves as a consultant and is on speaker's bureau for Eisai and BTG. Robert Wong is on the speaker's bureau, served as consultant and on advisory boards, and has received research funding from Gilead; has received research funding from Abbvie; and was on the speaker's bureau for Bayer. Shaun Chandna has served on an advisory board for Dova Pharmaceuticals; has received sponsored travel for research support from Genfit and Covance; and is on the speaker's bureau for Focus Medical Communications, LLC. Catherine Frenette is on speaker's bureaus for Bayer, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, Abbvie, and Eisai; served on advisory boards for Gilead, Eisai, and Wako; served as a consultant for Bayer and Gilead; and received research funding from Bayer. Sanjaya Satapathy has received research support from Gilead and Bayer; and has served on advisory boards or as a consultant for Abbvie and Gilead. Parvez Mantry is on speaker's bureaus and served on advisory boards for Gilead, Abbvie, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Merck, and BTG; and has received research funding from Gilead and Sirtex. Binu John receives research support from Eisai, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Bayer, Exact Sciences, and Varian; and has served on advisory boards for Gilead and Eisai. Michael Leise has received research funding from Abbvie. Nayan Patel has served on advisory boards for Gilead. Z. Gordon Jiang has served as a consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim. Amit Singal was on speaker's bureau for Gilead, Bayer, and Bristol Meyers Squibb; has served on advisory boards for Gilead, Abbvie, Bayer, Eisai, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Wako Diagnostics, and Exact Sciences; serves as a consultant to Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, Roche, Exact Sciences, and Glycotest; and has received research funding from Gilead and Abbvie. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 AGA Institute
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - Background & Aims: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are effective against hepatitis C virus and sustained virologic response is associated with reduced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is controversy over the use of DAAs in patients with active or treated HCC and uncertainty about optimal management of these patients. We aimed to characterize attitudes and practice patterns of hepatology practitioners in the United States regarding the use of DAAs in patients with HCC. Methods: We conducted a survey of hepatology providers at 47 tertiary care centers in 25 states. Surveys were sent to 476 providers and we received 279 responses (58.6%). Results: Provider beliefs about risk of HCC recurrence after DAA therapy varied: 48% responded that DAAs reduce risk, 36% responded that DAAs do not change risk, and 16% responded that DAAs increase risk of HCC recurrence. However, most providers believed DAAs to be beneficial to and reduce mortality of patients with complete response to HCC treatment. Accordingly, nearly all providers (94.9%) reported recommending DAA therapy to patients with early-stage HCC who received curative treatment. However, fewer providers recommended DAA therapy for patients with intermediate (72.9%) or advanced (57.5%) HCC undergoing palliative therapies. Timing of DAA initiation varied among providers based on HCC treatment modality: 49.1% of providers reported they would initiate DAA therapy within 3 months of surgical resection whereas 45.9% and 5.0% would delay DAA initiation for 3–12 months and >1 year post-surgery, respectively. For patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 42.0% of providers would provide DAAs within 3 months of the procedure, 46.7% would delay DAAs until 3–12 months afterward, and 11.3% would delay DAAs more than 1 year after TACE. Conclusions: Based on a survey sent to hepatology providers, there is variation in provider attitudes and practice patterns regarding use and timing of DAAs for patients with HCC. Further studies are needed to characterize the risks and benefits of DAA therapy in this patient population.
AB - Background & Aims: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are effective against hepatitis C virus and sustained virologic response is associated with reduced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is controversy over the use of DAAs in patients with active or treated HCC and uncertainty about optimal management of these patients. We aimed to characterize attitudes and practice patterns of hepatology practitioners in the United States regarding the use of DAAs in patients with HCC. Methods: We conducted a survey of hepatology providers at 47 tertiary care centers in 25 states. Surveys were sent to 476 providers and we received 279 responses (58.6%). Results: Provider beliefs about risk of HCC recurrence after DAA therapy varied: 48% responded that DAAs reduce risk, 36% responded that DAAs do not change risk, and 16% responded that DAAs increase risk of HCC recurrence. However, most providers believed DAAs to be beneficial to and reduce mortality of patients with complete response to HCC treatment. Accordingly, nearly all providers (94.9%) reported recommending DAA therapy to patients with early-stage HCC who received curative treatment. However, fewer providers recommended DAA therapy for patients with intermediate (72.9%) or advanced (57.5%) HCC undergoing palliative therapies. Timing of DAA initiation varied among providers based on HCC treatment modality: 49.1% of providers reported they would initiate DAA therapy within 3 months of surgical resection whereas 45.9% and 5.0% would delay DAA initiation for 3–12 months and >1 year post-surgery, respectively. For patients undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 42.0% of providers would provide DAAs within 3 months of the procedure, 46.7% would delay DAAs until 3–12 months afterward, and 11.3% would delay DAAs more than 1 year after TACE. Conclusions: Based on a survey sent to hepatology providers, there is variation in provider attitudes and practice patterns regarding use and timing of DAAs for patients with HCC. Further studies are needed to characterize the risks and benefits of DAA therapy in this patient population.
KW - Drug
KW - HCV
KW - Liver Cancer
KW - TACE
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081906841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081906841&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.042
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.07.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 31357028
AN - SCOPUS:85081906841
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 18
SP - 974
EP - 983
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 4
ER -