TY - JOUR
T1 - Premature coronary heart disease and autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia
T2 - Increased risk in women with LDLR mutations
AU - Ahmad, Zahid
AU - Li, Xilong
AU - Wosik, Jedrek
AU - Mani, Preethi
AU - Petr, Joye
AU - McLeod, George
AU - Murad, Shatha
AU - Song, Li
AU - Adams-Huet, Beverley
AU - Garg, Abhimanyu
N1 - Funding Information:
The work was supported by grants from the Southwest Medical Foundation , Center for Human Nutrition at UT Southwestern and from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) K23 HL114884 , NIH HL020948 and CTSA Grant UL1TR001105 for REDCap.
Funding Information:
Z.A. has received honorarium for educational talks sponsored by Sanofi and Genzyme and participated in advisory board meetings sponsored by Genzyme and Regeneron. A.G. received research grants from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, and Aegerion and is a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Amgen, and Eli Lilly.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 National Lipid Association.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Background For patients with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH), it remains unclear whether differences exist in the risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD) between patients with confirmed mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) vs those without detectable mutations. Objective This study sought to assess the risk of premature CHD in ADH patients with mutations in LDLR (referred to as familial hypercholesterolemia [FH]) vs those without detectable mutations (unexplained ADH), stratified by sex. Methods Comparative study of premature CHD in a multiethnic cohort of 111 men and 165 women meeting adult Simon-Broome criteria for ADH. Results Women with FH (n = 51) had an increased risk of premature CHD compared with unexplained ADH women (n = 111; hazard ratio [HR], 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-5.34; P =.003) even after adjustment for lipid levels and traditional CHD risk factors (HR, 2.53 [1.10-5.83]; P =.005). Men with FH (n = 42), in contrast, had a similar risk of premature CHD when compared with unexplained ADH men (n = 66; unadjusted: HR, 1.48 [0.84-2.63]; P =.18; adjusted: HR, 1.04 [0.46-2.37]; P =.72). To address whether mutation status provides additional information beyond LDL-cholesterol level, we analyzed premature CHD risk for FH vs unexplained ADH at various percentiles of LDL-cholesterol: the risk ratios were significant for women at 25th percentile (HR, 4.90 [1.69-14.19]) and 50th percentile (HR, 3.44 [1.42-8.32]) but not at 75th percentile (HR, 1.99 [0.95-4.17]), and were not significant for men at any percentile. Conclusions Our findings suggest that genetic confirmation of ADH may be important to identify patient's risk of CHD, especially for female LDLR mutation carriers.
AB - Background For patients with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia (ADH), it remains unclear whether differences exist in the risk of premature coronary heart disease (CHD) between patients with confirmed mutations in low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) vs those without detectable mutations. Objective This study sought to assess the risk of premature CHD in ADH patients with mutations in LDLR (referred to as familial hypercholesterolemia [FH]) vs those without detectable mutations (unexplained ADH), stratified by sex. Methods Comparative study of premature CHD in a multiethnic cohort of 111 men and 165 women meeting adult Simon-Broome criteria for ADH. Results Women with FH (n = 51) had an increased risk of premature CHD compared with unexplained ADH women (n = 111; hazard ratio [HR], 2.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-5.34; P =.003) even after adjustment for lipid levels and traditional CHD risk factors (HR, 2.53 [1.10-5.83]; P =.005). Men with FH (n = 42), in contrast, had a similar risk of premature CHD when compared with unexplained ADH men (n = 66; unadjusted: HR, 1.48 [0.84-2.63]; P =.18; adjusted: HR, 1.04 [0.46-2.37]; P =.72). To address whether mutation status provides additional information beyond LDL-cholesterol level, we analyzed premature CHD risk for FH vs unexplained ADH at various percentiles of LDL-cholesterol: the risk ratios were significant for women at 25th percentile (HR, 4.90 [1.69-14.19]) and 50th percentile (HR, 3.44 [1.42-8.32]) but not at 75th percentile (HR, 1.99 [0.95-4.17]), and were not significant for men at any percentile. Conclusions Our findings suggest that genetic confirmation of ADH may be important to identify patient's risk of CHD, especially for female LDLR mutation carriers.
KW - APOB
KW - Familial hypercholesterolemia
KW - LDLR
KW - Lipids
KW - Premature coronary heart disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958918142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958918142&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.09.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.09.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 26892126
AN - SCOPUS:84958918142
SN - 1933-2874
VL - 10
SP - 101-108.e3
JO - Journal of Clinical Lipidology
JF - Journal of Clinical Lipidology
IS - 1
ER -