TY - JOUR
T1 - Postdischarge surveillance for infection following cesarean section
T2 - A prospective cohort study comparing methodologies
AU - Halwani, Muhammad A.
AU - Turnbull, Alison E.
AU - Harris, Meredith
AU - Witter, Frank
AU - Perl, Trish M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was part of a research fellowship to MH funded by the Saudi Arabian government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Objective To assess how enhanced postdischarge telephone follow-up calls would improve case finding for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after cesarean section. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who delivered by cesarean section between April 22 and August 22, 2010. In addition to our routine surveillance, using clinical databases and electronic patient records, we also made follow-up calls to the patients at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperation. A standard questionnaire with questions about symptoms of SSI, health-seeking behaviors, and treatment received was administered. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to assess the effect of the enhanced surveillance. Results One hundred ninety-three patients underwent cesarean section during this study period. Standard surveillance identified 14 infections with telephone follow-ups identifying an additional 5 infections. Using the call as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI was 73.3%. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients. Conclusions Results suggest that follow-up telephone calls to patients following cesarean section identifies 26.3% of the total SSIs. Enhanced surveillance can provide more informed data to enhance performance and avoid underestimation of rates.
AB - Objective To assess how enhanced postdischarge telephone follow-up calls would improve case finding for surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance after cesarean section. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of all patients who delivered by cesarean section between April 22 and August 22, 2010. In addition to our routine surveillance, using clinical databases and electronic patient records, we also made follow-up calls to the patients at 7, 14, and 30 days postoperation. A standard questionnaire with questions about symptoms of SSI, health-seeking behaviors, and treatment received was administered. Descriptive statistics and univariate analysis were performed to assess the effect of the enhanced surveillance. Results One hundred ninety-three patients underwent cesarean section during this study period. Standard surveillance identified 14 infections with telephone follow-ups identifying an additional 5 infections. Using the call as a gold standard, the sensitivity of the standard methodology to capture SSI was 73.3%. The duration of the calls ranged from 1 to 5 minutes and were well received by the patients. Conclusions Results suggest that follow-up telephone calls to patients following cesarean section identifies 26.3% of the total SSIs. Enhanced surveillance can provide more informed data to enhance performance and avoid underestimation of rates.
KW - Cesarean section infection
KW - Post-discharge surveillance
KW - Surgical site infections
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954305061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954305061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.023
DO - 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.10.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 26706153
AN - SCOPUS:84954305061
SN - 0196-6553
VL - 44
SP - 455
EP - 457
JO - American Journal of Infection Control
JF - American Journal of Infection Control
IS - 4
ER -