TY - JOUR
T1 - Peripheral phenotype and gene expression profiles of combined liver-kidney transplant patients
AU - Dumontet, Erwan
AU - Danger, Richard
AU - Vagefi, Parsia A.
AU - Londoño, Maria Carlota
AU - Pallier, Annaïck
AU - Lozano, Juan José
AU - Giral, Magali
AU - Degauque, Nicolas
AU - Soulillou, Jean Paul
AU - Martínez-Llordella, Marc
AU - Lee, Herman
AU - Latournerie, Marianne
AU - Boudjema, Karim
AU - Dulong, Joelle
AU - Tarte, Karin
AU - Sanchez-Fueyo, Alberto
AU - Feng, Sandy
AU - Brouard, Sophie
AU - Conchon, Sophie
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all the patients who participated in this study and the physicians who helped us recruit patients: JF. Subra, F. Villemain, C. Legendre, E. Thervet, FJ. Bemelman, G. Roussey, G. Orlando, A. Garnier, H. Jambon, H. Le Monies De Sagazan, L. Braun, C. Noël, E. Pillebout, MC. Moal, C. Cantarell, A. Hoitsma, M. Ranbant, A. Testa. Financial support: R.D. was supported by the “Fondation Centaure” (RTRS) which supports a French research network in transplantation and by a grant from the “Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale” (FRM). E.D. was supported by a grant from the French National Academia of Medicine. INSERM U1064 was supported by the “Agence de la Biomédecine” and by the Association Française pour l''Etude du Foie, AFEF. PAV was supported by the ASTS/Novartis Fellowship in Transplantation Award. This work was carried out in the context of the IHU-Cesti project, which received financial support from the French government, managed by the National Research Agency (“Investment Into The Future” program ANR-10-IBHU-005), and from Nantes Metropole and the Pays de la Loire Region. The Institute of Liver Studies (KCL) is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King''s College London, UK – MRC grant no. MR/J006742/1 and by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy''s and St Thomas'' NHS Foundation Trust and King''s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health . Conflict of interest: The authors do not have any disclosures to report.
Funding Information:
We thank all the patients who participated in this study and the physicians who helped us recruit patients: JF. Subra, F. Villemain, C. Legendre, E. Thervet, FJ. Bemelman, G. Roussey, G. Orlando, A. Garnier, H. Jambon, H. Le Monies De Sagazan, L. Braun, C. No?l, E. Pillebout, MC. Moal, C. Cantarell, A. Hoitsma, M. Ranbant, A. Testa. Financial support: R.D. was supported by the ?Fondation Centaure? (RTRS) which supports a French research network in transplantation and by a grant from the ?Fondation pour la Recherche M?dicale? (FRM). E.D. was supported by a grant from the French National Academia of Medicine. INSERM U1064 was supported by the ?Agence de la Biom?decine? and by the Association Fran?aise pour l''Etude du Foie, AFEF. PAV was supported by the ASTS/Novartis Fellowship in Transplantation Award. This work was carried out in the context of the IHU-Cesti project, which received financial support from the French government, managed by the National Research Agency (?Investment Into The Future? program ANR-10-IBHU-005), and from Nantes Metropole and the Pays de la Loire Region. The Institute of Liver Studies (KCL) is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King''s College London, UK ? MRC grant no. MR/J006742/1 and by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy''s and St Thomas'' NHS Foundation Trust and King''s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health . Conflict of interest: The authors do not have any disclosures to report.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - Background and Aims: The beneficial effect of one graft on another has been reported in combined transplantation but the associated mechanisms and biological influence of each graft have not yet been established. Methods: In multiple analyses, we explored the PBMC phenotype and signature of 45 immune-related messenger RNAs and 754 microRNAs from a total of 235 patients, including combined liver-kidney transplant recipients (CLK), patients with a liver (L-STA) or kidney (K-STA) graft only under classical immunosuppression and patients with tolerated liver (L-TOL) or kidney grafts (K-TOL). Results: CLK show an intermediary phenotype with a higher percentage of peripheral CD19+CD24+CD38Low memory B cells and Helios+ Treg cells, two features associated with tolerance profiles, compared to L-STA and K-STA (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Very few miRNA were significantly differentially expressed in CLK vs. K-STA and even fewer when compared to L-STA (35 and 8, P < 0.05). Finally, CLK are predicted to share common miRNA targets with K-TOL and even more with L-TOL (344 and 411, P = 0.005). Altogether CLK display an intermediary phenotype and gene profile, which is closer to that of liver transplant patients, with possible similarities with the profiles of tolerant patients. Conclusion: These data suggest that CLK patients show the immunological influence of both allografts with liver having a greater influence.
AB - Background and Aims: The beneficial effect of one graft on another has been reported in combined transplantation but the associated mechanisms and biological influence of each graft have not yet been established. Methods: In multiple analyses, we explored the PBMC phenotype and signature of 45 immune-related messenger RNAs and 754 microRNAs from a total of 235 patients, including combined liver-kidney transplant recipients (CLK), patients with a liver (L-STA) or kidney (K-STA) graft only under classical immunosuppression and patients with tolerated liver (L-TOL) or kidney grafts (K-TOL). Results: CLK show an intermediary phenotype with a higher percentage of peripheral CD19+CD24+CD38Low memory B cells and Helios+ Treg cells, two features associated with tolerance profiles, compared to L-STA and K-STA (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Very few miRNA were significantly differentially expressed in CLK vs. K-STA and even fewer when compared to L-STA (35 and 8, P < 0.05). Finally, CLK are predicted to share common miRNA targets with K-TOL and even more with L-TOL (344 and 411, P = 0.005). Altogether CLK display an intermediary phenotype and gene profile, which is closer to that of liver transplant patients, with possible similarities with the profiles of tolerant patients. Conclusion: These data suggest that CLK patients show the immunological influence of both allografts with liver having a greater influence.
KW - Combined transplantation
KW - Gene expression
KW - Human
KW - Kidney transplantation
KW - Liver transplantation
KW - MicroRNA
KW - Phenotype
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958944201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958944201&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/liv.12917
DO - 10.1111/liv.12917
M3 - Article
C2 - 26193627
AN - SCOPUS:84958944201
SN - 1478-3223
VL - 36
SP - 401
EP - 409
JO - Liver International
JF - Liver International
IS - 3
ER -