Patient perceptions of factors leading to spasmodic dysphonia: A combined clinical experience of 350 patients

Lesley Childs, Scott Rickert, Thomas Murry, Andrew Blitzer, Lucian Sulica

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Spasmodic dysphonia (SD) is an idiopathic voice disorder that is characterized by either a strained, strangled voice quality or a breathy voice with aphonic segments of connected speech. It has been suggested that environmental factors play a role in triggering the onset. Clinical observation suggests that some patients associate onset with specific events or factors while others do not. The purpose of this study was to examine a large database of SD patients to determine if specific triggers are associated with the onset of SD. Procedures: Retrospective chart review. Results: A total of 350 charts of patients with SD were identified and were categorized as either "sudden onset" or "gradual onset." One hundred sixty-nine recalled their circumstances surrounding onset. Forty-five percent of these patients described the onset as sudden. Patient perceptions of inciting events in the sudden onset group were identified 77% of the time and 2% of the time in the gradual onset group. The most common factors identified were stress (42%), upper respiratory infection (33%), and pregnancy and parturition (10%). Conclusions: Thirty-five percent of SD patients perceive their disorder to have a sudden onset with identified inciting events. This prevalence raises questions regarding possible behavioral and environmental factors surrounding the onset of this disorder.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2195-2198
Number of pages4
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume121
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Spasmodic dysphonia
  • gradual onset
  • sudden onset

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient perceptions of factors leading to spasmodic dysphonia: A combined clinical experience of 350 patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this