TY - JOUR
T1 - Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes
AU - PIONEER 6 Investigators
AU - Husain, Mansoor
AU - Birkenfeld, Andreas L.
AU - Donsmark, Morten
AU - Dungan, Kathleen
AU - Eliaschewitz, Freddy G.
AU - Franco, Denise R.
AU - Jeppesen, Ole K.
AU - Lingvay, Ildiko
AU - Mosenzon, Ofri
AU - Pedersen, Sue D.
AU - Tack, Cees J.
AU - Thomsen, Mette
AU - Vilsbøll, Tina
AU - Warren, Mark L.
AU - Bain, Stephen C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Husain reports receiving grant support and consulting fees from AstraZeneca and Merck, consulting fees and lecture fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen, grant support, consulting fees, and lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, and consulting fees from Roche, holding a pending patent (US61/721,819) on methods for inhibiting platelet aggregation with the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, and holding pending patents (US61/719,075 and EP2911686A1) on peptides and methods for preventing ischemic tissue injury; Dr. Birkenfeld, receiving advisory board fees and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sanofi and grant support, paid to his institution, advisory board fees, and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; Dr. Donsmark, being employed by and holding shares in Novo Nordisk; Dr. Dungan, receiving grant support, consulting fees, and travel support from Eli Lilly, grant support, advisory board fees, writing assistance, and travel support from Sanofi Aventis, advisory board fees and travel support from MannKind, grant support and consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, and grant support from AstraZeneca, ViaCyte, and Merck; Dr. Eliaschewitz, receiving advisory board fees and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca and advisory board fees from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Takeda; Dr. Franco, receiving advisory board fees and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Abbott Laboratories, and Medtronic; Mr. Jeppesen, being employed by Novo Nordisk; Dr. Lingvay, receiving grant support, editorial support, consulting fees, and travel support from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting fees from MannKind, Valeritas, Intarcia Therapeutics, and Target PharmaSolutions, and grant support from Merck, Novartis, Mylan, and GI Dynamics; Dr. Mosenzon, receiving advisory board fees and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Boehringer Ingelheim and grant support, paid to her institution, advisory board fees, and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from AstraZeneca; Dr. Pedersen, receiving advisory board fees, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, consulting fees, writing assistance, and travel support from Novo Nordisk, advisory board fees, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, consulting fees, and travel support from Janssen, grant support, advisory board fees, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, and travel support from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Sanofi, advisory board fees and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Merck, advisory board fees, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, and travel support from Bausch Health/Valeant Pharmaceuticals, grant support, advisory board fees, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, consulting fees, and travel support from AstraZeneca, grant support, advisory board fees, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, and consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories, and fees for service during a clinical trial from Prometic Life Sciences and Pfizer; Dr. Tack, receiving grant support from AstraZeneca, advisory board fees from Merck, and lecture fees and advisory board fees from Novo Nordisk; Dr. Thomsen, being employed by and holding shares in Novo Nordisk; Dr. Vilsb?ll, receiving consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme/Merck, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Bristol-Myers Squibb and grant support and consulting fees from Novo Nordisk and Boehringer Ingelheim; Dr. Warren, receiving grant support, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, consulting fees, and travel support from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, and Sanofi, grant support from Mylan and Gan & Lee Pharmaceutical, grant support and fees for serving on a speakers bureau from Medtronic, fees for serving on a speakers bureau and travel support from AstraZeneca and Merck, and grant support, fees for serving on a speakers bureau, and travel support from MannKind; and Dr. Bain, receiving grant support and honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi Aventis and owning shares in Glycosmedia. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding Information:
All the authors had full access to the data, participated in drafting or critical revision of the manuscript, made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication, and vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data and for the adherence of the trial to the protocol. The manuscript was drafted with support from a medical writer (funded by the sponsor), under the direction of the authors.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2019/8/29
Y1 - 2019/8/29
N2 - BACKGROUND Establishing cardiovascular safety of new therapies for type 2 diabetes is important. Safety data are available for the subcutaneous form of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide but are needed for oral semaglutide. METHODS We assessed cardiovascular outcomes of once-daily oral semaglutide in an event-driven, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients at high cardiovascular risk (age of ≥50 years with established cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease, or age of ≥60 years with cardiovascular risk factors only). The primary outcome in a time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). The trial was designed to rule out 80% excess cardiovascular risk as compared with placebo (noninferiority margin of 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for the primary outcome). RESULTS A total of 3183 patients were randomly assigned to receive oral semaglutide or placebo. The mean age of the patients was 66 years; 2695 patients (84.7%) were 50 years of age or older and had cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease. The median time in the trial was 15.9 months. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 61 of 1591 patients (3.8%) in the oral semaglutide group and 76 of 1592 (4.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 1.11; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Results for components of the primary outcome were as follows: death from cardiovascular causes, 15 of 1591 patients (0.9%) in the oral semaglutide group and 30 of 1592 (1.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.92); nonfatal myocardial infarction, 37 of 1591 patients (2.3%) and 31 of 1592 (1.9%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.90); and nonfatal stroke, 12 of 1591 patients (0.8%) and 16 of 1592 (1.0%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.57). Death from any cause occurred in 23 of 1591 patients (1.4%) in the oral semaglutide group and 45 of 1592 (2.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.84). Gastrointestinal adverse events leading to discontinuation of oral semaglutide or placebo were more common with oral semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with type 2 diabetes, the cardiovascular risk profile of oral semaglutide was not inferior to that of placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; PIONEER 6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02692716.).
AB - BACKGROUND Establishing cardiovascular safety of new therapies for type 2 diabetes is important. Safety data are available for the subcutaneous form of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide but are needed for oral semaglutide. METHODS We assessed cardiovascular outcomes of once-daily oral semaglutide in an event-driven, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients at high cardiovascular risk (age of ≥50 years with established cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease, or age of ≥60 years with cardiovascular risk factors only). The primary outcome in a time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). The trial was designed to rule out 80% excess cardiovascular risk as compared with placebo (noninferiority margin of 1.8 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for the primary outcome). RESULTS A total of 3183 patients were randomly assigned to receive oral semaglutide or placebo. The mean age of the patients was 66 years; 2695 patients (84.7%) were 50 years of age or older and had cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease. The median time in the trial was 15.9 months. Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 61 of 1591 patients (3.8%) in the oral semaglutide group and 76 of 1592 (4.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 1.11; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Results for components of the primary outcome were as follows: death from cardiovascular causes, 15 of 1591 patients (0.9%) in the oral semaglutide group and 30 of 1592 (1.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.92); nonfatal myocardial infarction, 37 of 1591 patients (2.3%) and 31 of 1592 (1.9%), respectively (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.90); and nonfatal stroke, 12 of 1591 patients (0.8%) and 16 of 1592 (1.0%), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.57). Death from any cause occurred in 23 of 1591 patients (1.4%) in the oral semaglutide group and 45 of 1592 (2.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.84). Gastrointestinal adverse events leading to discontinuation of oral semaglutide or placebo were more common with oral semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with type 2 diabetes, the cardiovascular risk profile of oral semaglutide was not inferior to that of placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; PIONEER 6 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02692716.).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068754660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068754660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118
M3 - Article
C2 - 31185157
AN - SCOPUS:85068754660
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 381
SP - 841
EP - 851
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 9
ER -