TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing Online Adaptation Timing in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
AU - Yen, Allen
AU - Zhong, Xinran
AU - Lin, Mu Han
AU - Nwachukwu, Chika
AU - Albuquerque, Kevin
AU - Hrycushko, Brian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Society for Radiation Oncology
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - Purpose: Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) has emerged as a new treatment modality for cervical cancer. Daily online adapting improves target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing compared with traditional image guided radiation therapy (IGRT); however, the required resources may not be feasible in a busy clinical setting. Less frequent adapting may still benefit cervical cancer patients due to large volume changes of the uterocervix of the treatment course. In this study, the dosimetry from different online adapt-on-demand schedules was compared. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of 10 patients with cervical cancer treated with 260 fractions of definitive daily online ART was included. Plans with different adaptation schedules were simulated with adaptations weekly, every other week, once during treatment, and no adaptations (IGRT). These plans were applied to the synthetic computed tomography (CT) images and contours generated during the patient's delivered daily adaptive workflow. The dosimetry of the weekly replan, every-other-week replan, once replan, and IGRT plans were compared using a paired t test. Results: Compared with traditional IGRT plans, weekly and every-other-week ART plans had similar clinical target volume (CTV) coverage, but statistically significant improved sparing of OARs. Weekly and every-other-week ART had reduced bowel bag V40 by 1.57% and 1.41%, bladder V40 by 3.82% and 1.64%, rectum V40 by 8.49% and 7.50%, and bone marrow Dmean by 0.81% and 0.61%, respectively. Plans with a single adaptation had statistically significantly worse target coverage, and moderate improvements in OAR sparing. Of the 18-dose metrics evaluated, improvements were seen in 15 for weekly ART, 14 for every-other-week ART, and 10 for single ART plans compared with IGRT. When every-other-week ART was compared with weekly ART, both plans had similar CTV coverage and OAR sparing with only small improvements in bone marrow dosimetry with weekly ART. Conclusions: This retrospective work compares different adapt-on-demand treatment schedules using data collected from patients treated with daily online adaptive radiation therapy. Results suggest weekly or every-other-week online ART is beneficial for reduced OAR dose compared with IGRT by exploiting the gradual changes in the uterocervix target volume.
AB - Purpose: Online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) has emerged as a new treatment modality for cervical cancer. Daily online adapting improves target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing compared with traditional image guided radiation therapy (IGRT); however, the required resources may not be feasible in a busy clinical setting. Less frequent adapting may still benefit cervical cancer patients due to large volume changes of the uterocervix of the treatment course. In this study, the dosimetry from different online adapt-on-demand schedules was compared. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort of 10 patients with cervical cancer treated with 260 fractions of definitive daily online ART was included. Plans with different adaptation schedules were simulated with adaptations weekly, every other week, once during treatment, and no adaptations (IGRT). These plans were applied to the synthetic computed tomography (CT) images and contours generated during the patient's delivered daily adaptive workflow. The dosimetry of the weekly replan, every-other-week replan, once replan, and IGRT plans were compared using a paired t test. Results: Compared with traditional IGRT plans, weekly and every-other-week ART plans had similar clinical target volume (CTV) coverage, but statistically significant improved sparing of OARs. Weekly and every-other-week ART had reduced bowel bag V40 by 1.57% and 1.41%, bladder V40 by 3.82% and 1.64%, rectum V40 by 8.49% and 7.50%, and bone marrow Dmean by 0.81% and 0.61%, respectively. Plans with a single adaptation had statistically significantly worse target coverage, and moderate improvements in OAR sparing. Of the 18-dose metrics evaluated, improvements were seen in 15 for weekly ART, 14 for every-other-week ART, and 10 for single ART plans compared with IGRT. When every-other-week ART was compared with weekly ART, both plans had similar CTV coverage and OAR sparing with only small improvements in bone marrow dosimetry with weekly ART. Conclusions: This retrospective work compares different adapt-on-demand treatment schedules using data collected from patients treated with daily online adaptive radiation therapy. Results suggest weekly or every-other-week online ART is beneficial for reduced OAR dose compared with IGRT by exploiting the gradual changes in the uterocervix target volume.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178570308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178570308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2023.10.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 37923136
AN - SCOPUS:85178570308
SN - 1879-8500
VL - 14
SP - e159-e164
JO - Practical Radiation Oncology
JF - Practical Radiation Oncology
IS - 2
ER -