OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines

Aaron Babier, Rafid Mahmood, Binghao Zhang, Victor G.L. Alves, Ana Maria Barragán-Montero, Joel Beaudry, Carlos E. Cardenas, Yankui Chang, Zijie Chen, Jaehee Chun, Kelly Diaz, Harold David Eraso, Erik Faustmann, Sibaji Gaj, Skylar Gay, Mary Gronberg, Bingqi Guo, Junjun He, Gerd Heilemann, Sanchit HiraYuliang Huang, Fuxin Ji, Dashan Jiang, Jean Carlo Jimenez Giraldo, Hoyeon Lee, Jun Lian, Shuolin Liu, Keng Chi Liu, José Marrugo, Kentaro Miki, Kunio Nakamura, Tucker Netherton, Dan Nguyen, Hamidreza Nourzadeh, Alexander F.I. Osman, Zhao Peng, Jose Darío Quinto Muñoz, Christian Ramsl, Dong Joo Rhee, Juan David Rodriguez, Hongming Shan, Jeffrey V. Siebers, Mumtaz H. Soomro, Kay Sun, Andrés Usuga Hoyos, Carlos Valderrama, Rob Verbeek, Enpei Wang, Siri Willems, Qi Wu, Xuanang Xu, Sen Yang, Lulin Yuan, Simeng Zhu, Lukas Zimmermann, Kevin L. Moore, Thomas G. Purdie, Andrea L. McNiven, Timothy C.Y. Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. To establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP). Approach. Our framework includes radiotherapy treatment data (i.e. reference plans) for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. That data also includes high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups using out-of-sample data during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four fluence-based dose mimicking models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans (76 pipelines × 100 patients). The predictions and KBP-generated plans were compared to the reference plans via: the dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) points; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models. Main results. The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50-0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions was generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P < 0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH points. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans, which satisfied 3.5% more criteria than the set of all dose predictions. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for an inverse planning model. Significance. This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. We found that the best performing models significantly outperformed the reference dose and dose predictions. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number185012
JournalPhysics in medicine and biology
Volume67
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 21 2022

Keywords

  • automated planning
  • inverse optimization
  • inverse problem
  • knowledge-based planning
  • open data
  • optimization
  • radiotherapy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'OpenKBP-Opt: An international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this