TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncology medical home
T2 - ASCO and COA standards
AU - Woofter, Kim
AU - Kennedy, Erin B.
AU - Adelson, Kerin
AU - Bowman, Ronda
AU - Brodie, Rachel
AU - Dickson, Natalie
AU - Gerber, Rose
AU - Fields, Karen K.
AU - Murtaugh, Carol
AU - Polite, Blase
AU - Paschall, Marcus
AU - Skelton, Matthew
AU - Zoet, Dennis
AU - Cox, John V.
N1 - Funding Information:
Initial efforts to codify Standards for OMH adapted existing Standards for primary care to oncology practice. Multiple organizations, including the NCQA, the Commission on Cancer (CoC), ASCO, Community Oncology Alliance (COA), the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (NCCS), and others, have worked to align existing quality programs to these efforts. Two sentinel, federally funded evaluations of the OMH model provided a framework of Standards that inform this work: the previously referenced COME HOME project (supported by a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation grant), and a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute–funded, NCQA/NCCS–led project that tested the process of transformation of oncology practices in Southeastern Pennsylvania to an OMH model.24 The Standards included within this article are built upon these efforts and the work of COA, along with clinical pathways and chemotherapy safety Standards published by ASCO.25,26
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - PURPOSE To provide Standards on the basis of evidence and expert consensus for a pilot of the Oncology Medical Home (OMH) certification program. The OMH model is a system of care delivery that features coordinated, efficient, accessible, and evidence-based care and includes a process for measurement of outcomes to facilitate continuous quality improvement. The OMH pilot is intended to inform further refinement of Standards for OMH model implementation. METHODS An Expert Panel was formed, and a systematic review of the literature on the topics of OMH, clinical pathways, and survivorship care plans was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Using this evidence base and an informal consensus process, the Expert Panel developed a set of OMH Standards. Public comments were solicited and considered in preparation of the final manuscript. RESULTS Three comparative peer-reviewed studies of OMH met the inclusion criteria. In addition, the results from 16 studies of clinical pathways and one systematic review of survivorship care plans informed the evidence review. Limitations of the evidence base included the small number of studies of OMH and lack of longer-term outcomes data. More data were available to inform the specific Standards for pathways and survivorship care; however, outcomes were mixed for the latter intervention. The Expert Panel concluded that in the future, practices should be encouraged to publish the results of OMH interventions in peer-reviewed journals to improve the evidence base. STANDARDS Standards are provided for OMH in the areas of patient engagement, availability and access to care, evidence-based medicine, equitable and comprehensive team-based care, quality improvement, goals of care, palliative and end-of-life care discussions, and chemotherapy safety. Additional information, including a Standards implementation manual, is available at www.asco.org/standards.
AB - PURPOSE To provide Standards on the basis of evidence and expert consensus for a pilot of the Oncology Medical Home (OMH) certification program. The OMH model is a system of care delivery that features coordinated, efficient, accessible, and evidence-based care and includes a process for measurement of outcomes to facilitate continuous quality improvement. The OMH pilot is intended to inform further refinement of Standards for OMH model implementation. METHODS An Expert Panel was formed, and a systematic review of the literature on the topics of OMH, clinical pathways, and survivorship care plans was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Using this evidence base and an informal consensus process, the Expert Panel developed a set of OMH Standards. Public comments were solicited and considered in preparation of the final manuscript. RESULTS Three comparative peer-reviewed studies of OMH met the inclusion criteria. In addition, the results from 16 studies of clinical pathways and one systematic review of survivorship care plans informed the evidence review. Limitations of the evidence base included the small number of studies of OMH and lack of longer-term outcomes data. More data were available to inform the specific Standards for pathways and survivorship care; however, outcomes were mixed for the latter intervention. The Expert Panel concluded that in the future, practices should be encouraged to publish the results of OMH interventions in peer-reviewed journals to improve the evidence base. STANDARDS Standards are provided for OMH in the areas of patient engagement, availability and access to care, evidence-based medicine, equitable and comprehensive team-based care, quality improvement, goals of care, palliative and end-of-life care discussions, and chemotherapy safety. Additional information, including a Standards implementation manual, is available at www.asco.org/standards.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114119800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114119800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/OP.21.00167
DO - 10.1200/OP.21.00167
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34255551
AN - SCOPUS:85114119800
SN - 2688-1527
VL - 17
SP - 475
EP - 492
JO - JCO Oncology Practice
JF - JCO Oncology Practice
IS - 9
ER -