TY - CHAP
T1 - Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Assessment in Patients with Suspected Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension
AU - Schmidt, Bernhard
AU - Czosnyka, Marek
AU - Cardim, Danilo
AU - Rosengarten, Bernhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Introduction: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) usually occurs in obese women of childbearing age. Typical symptoms are headache and sight disorders. Besides ophthalmoscopy, lumbar puncture is used for both diagnosis and therapy of IIH. In this study, noninvasively-assessed intracranial pressure (nICP) was compared to lumbar pressure (LP) to clarify its suitability for diagnosis of IIH. Methods: nICP was calculated using continuous signals of arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity, a method previously introduced by the authors. In thirteen patients (f = 11, m = 2; age: 36 ± 10 years), nICP was assessed 1 h prior to LP. If LP was >20 cmH2O (~15 mmHg), lumbar drainage was performed, LP was measured again, and nICP was reassessed. Results: In six patients, LP and nICP were compared after lumbar drainage. In three patients, assessment of nICP versus LP was repeated. In total, LP and nICP correlated with R = 0.82 (p < 0.001; N = 22). Mean difference of ICP-nICP was 0.8 ± 3.7 mmHg. Presuming 15 mmHg as critical threshold for indication of lumbar drainage in 20 of 22 cases, the clinical implications would have been the same in both methods. Conclusion: TCD-based ICP assessment seems to be a promising method for pre-diagnosis of increased LP and might prevent the need for lumbar puncture if nICP is low.
AB - Introduction: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) usually occurs in obese women of childbearing age. Typical symptoms are headache and sight disorders. Besides ophthalmoscopy, lumbar puncture is used for both diagnosis and therapy of IIH. In this study, noninvasively-assessed intracranial pressure (nICP) was compared to lumbar pressure (LP) to clarify its suitability for diagnosis of IIH. Methods: nICP was calculated using continuous signals of arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity, a method previously introduced by the authors. In thirteen patients (f = 11, m = 2; age: 36 ± 10 years), nICP was assessed 1 h prior to LP. If LP was >20 cmH2O (~15 mmHg), lumbar drainage was performed, LP was measured again, and nICP was reassessed. Results: In six patients, LP and nICP were compared after lumbar drainage. In three patients, assessment of nICP versus LP was repeated. In total, LP and nICP correlated with R = 0.82 (p < 0.001; N = 22). Mean difference of ICP-nICP was 0.8 ± 3.7 mmHg. Presuming 15 mmHg as critical threshold for indication of lumbar drainage in 20 of 22 cases, the clinical implications would have been the same in both methods. Conclusion: TCD-based ICP assessment seems to be a promising method for pre-diagnosis of increased LP and might prevent the need for lumbar puncture if nICP is low.
KW - Arterial blood pressure
KW - Cerebral blood flow velocity
KW - Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
KW - Lumbar pressure
KW - Lumbar puncture
KW - Noninvasive ICP
KW - Pseudotumour cerebri
KW - Transcranial Doppler
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104142240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104142240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_62
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_62
M3 - Chapter
C2 - 33839868
AN - SCOPUS:85104142240
T3 - Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum
SP - 325
EP - 327
BT - Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
ER -