New perspectives on brain death

Matthew P. Kirschen, Ariane Lewis, Michael Rubin, Pedro Kurtz, David M. Greer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Brain death, or death by neurological criteria (BD/DNC), has been accepted conceptually, medically and legally for decades. Nevertheless, some areas remain controversial or understudied, pointing to a need for focused research to advance the field. Multiple recent contributions have increased our understanding of BD/DNC, solidified our practice and provided guidance where previously lacking. There have also been important developments on a global scale, including in low-to-middle income countries such as in South America. Although variability in protocols and practice still exists, new efforts are underway to reduce inconsistencies and better train practitioners in accurate and sound BD/DNC determination. Various legal challenges have required formal responses from national societies, and the American Academy of Neurology has filled this void with much needed guidance. Questions remain regarding concepts such as € whole brain' versus € brainstem' death, and the intersection of BD/DNC and rubrics of medical futility. These concepts are the subject of this review.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-262
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and psychiatry
Volume92
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2021

Keywords

  • acquired brain injury
  • traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'New perspectives on brain death'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this