TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable melanoma
T2 - a single-centre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial
AU - Amaria, Rodabe N.
AU - Prieto, Peter A.
AU - Tetzlaff, Michael T.
AU - Reuben, Alexandre
AU - Andrews, Miles C.
AU - Ross, Merrick I.
AU - Glitza, Isabella C.
AU - Cormier, Janice
AU - Hwu, Wen Jen
AU - Tawbi, Hussein A.
AU - Patel, Sapna P.
AU - Lee, Jeffrey E.
AU - Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
AU - Spencer, Christine N.
AU - Gopalakrishnan, Vancheswaran
AU - Bassett, Roland
AU - Simpson, Lauren
AU - Mouton, Rosalind
AU - Hudgens, Courtney W.
AU - Zhao, Li
AU - Zhu, Haifeng
AU - Cooper, Zachary A.
AU - Wani, Khalida
AU - Lazar, Alexander
AU - Hwu, Patrick
AU - Diab, Adi
AU - Wong, Michael K.
AU - McQuade, Jennifer L.
AU - Royal, Richard
AU - Lucci, Anthony
AU - Burton, Elizabeth M.
AU - Reddy, Sangeetha
AU - Sharma, Padmanee
AU - Allison, James
AU - Futreal, Phillip A.
AU - Woodman, Scott E.
AU - Davies, Michael A.
AU - Wargo, Jennifer A.
N1 - Funding Information:
RNA reports grants from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Array Biopharma, all outside the submitted work. MTT reports personal fees from Myriad Genetics, Seattle Genetics, and Galderma, all outside the submitted work. MCA reports grants from Pfizer Australia, and non-financial support from Merck and Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia, outside the submitted work. W-JH reports research grants from Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, and has served on an advisory board for Merck, all outside the submitted work. HAT reports personal fees from Novartis, grants from Merck and Celgene, and grants and personal fees from BMS and Genentech, all outside the submitted work. JEG reports advisory board participation with Merck and Castle Biosciences. CNS and VG report patents for gut microbiome pending. RB reports grants from NIH. AL reports personal fees from BMS, Novartis, Merck, and Genentech/Roche; personal fees and non-financial support from ArcherDX and Beta-Cat; grants and non-financial support from Medimmune/Astra Zeneca and Sanofi; and grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Janssen, all outside the submitted work. MKW reports personal fees from Merck and EMD Serono, outside the submitted work. PS reports consultant or advisor fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Jounce, Kite Pharma, Neon, Evelo, EMD Serono, and Astellas, during the conduct of the study; stock from Jounce, Kite Pharma, Evelo, Constellation, and Neon outside the submitted work; and has a patent licensed to Jounce for a novel immunotherapy outside the submitted work. MAD reports personal fees from Novartis, BMS, and Vaccinex; grants from Astra Zeneca and Merck; and grants and personal fees from Roche/Genentech and Sanofi Aventis, all outside the submitted work. JAW has received compensation for a speaker's bureau and honoraria from Dava Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Illumina, and has served on advisory committees for GlaxoSmithKline, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, and Astra Zeneca. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation supplied the drugs and funded the clinical aspects of this study. The correlative research was funded by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150030) and from philanthropic funds from the MD Anderson Melanoma Moon Shot Program and the Dr Miriam and Sheldon G Adelson Medical Research Foundation. We sincerely thank the patients and their families for participating in this clinical trial.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Background: Dual BRAF and MEK inhibition produces a response in a large number of patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant melanoma. The existing standard of care for patients with clinical stage III melanoma is upfront surgery and consideration for adjuvant therapy, which is insufficient to cure most patients. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (such as dabrafenib and trametinib) might provide clinical benefit in this high-risk p opulation. Methods: We undertook this single-centre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed surgically resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K (ie, Val600Glu or Val600Lys)-mutated melanoma. Eligible patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, a life expectancy of more than 3 years, and no previous exposure to BRAF or MEK inhibitors. Exclusion criteria included metastases to bone, brain, or other sites where complete surgical excision was in doubt. We randomly assigned patients (1:2) to either upfront surgery and consideration for adjuvant therapy (standard of care group) or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib (8 weeks of neoadjuvant oral dabrafenib 150 mg twice per day and oral trametinib 2 mg per day followed by surgery, then up to 44 weeks of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib starting 1 week after surgery for a total of 52 weeks of treatment). Randomisation was not masked and was implemented by the clinical trial conduct website maintained by the trial centre. Patients were stratified by disease stage. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed event-free survival (ie, patients who were alive without disease progression) at 12 months in the intent-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02231775. Findings: Between Oct 23, 2014, and April 13, 2016, we randomly assigned seven patients to standard of care, and 14 to neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib. The trial was stopped early after a prespecified interim safety analysis that occurred after a quarter of the participants had been accrued revealed significantly longer event-free survival with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib than with standard of care. After a median follow-up of 18·6 months (IQR 14·6–23·1), significantly more patients receiving neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib were alive without disease progression than those receiving standard of care (ten [71%] of 14 patients vs none of seven in the standard of care group; median event-free survival was 19·7 months [16·2–not estimable] vs 2·9 months [95% CI 1·7–not estimable]; hazard ratio 0·016, 95% CI 0·00012–0·14, p<0·0001). Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib were well tolerated with no occurrence of grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths. The most common adverse events in the neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib group were expected grade 1–2 toxicities including chills (12 patients [92%]), headache (12 [92%]), and pyrexia (ten [77%]). The most common grade 3 adverse event was diarrhoea (two patients [15%]). Interpretation: Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib significantly improved event-free survival versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable, clinical stage III–IV melanoma. Although the trial finished early, limiting generalisability of the results, the findings provide proof-of-concept and support the rationale for further investigation of neoadjuvant approaches in this disease. This trial is currently continuing accrual as a single-arm study of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib. Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
AB - Background: Dual BRAF and MEK inhibition produces a response in a large number of patients with stage IV BRAF-mutant melanoma. The existing standard of care for patients with clinical stage III melanoma is upfront surgery and consideration for adjuvant therapy, which is insufficient to cure most patients. Neoadjuvant targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (such as dabrafenib and trametinib) might provide clinical benefit in this high-risk p opulation. Methods: We undertook this single-centre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). Eligible participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed surgically resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K (ie, Val600Glu or Val600Lys)-mutated melanoma. Eligible patients had to have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, a life expectancy of more than 3 years, and no previous exposure to BRAF or MEK inhibitors. Exclusion criteria included metastases to bone, brain, or other sites where complete surgical excision was in doubt. We randomly assigned patients (1:2) to either upfront surgery and consideration for adjuvant therapy (standard of care group) or neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib (8 weeks of neoadjuvant oral dabrafenib 150 mg twice per day and oral trametinib 2 mg per day followed by surgery, then up to 44 weeks of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib starting 1 week after surgery for a total of 52 weeks of treatment). Randomisation was not masked and was implemented by the clinical trial conduct website maintained by the trial centre. Patients were stratified by disease stage. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed event-free survival (ie, patients who were alive without disease progression) at 12 months in the intent-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02231775. Findings: Between Oct 23, 2014, and April 13, 2016, we randomly assigned seven patients to standard of care, and 14 to neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib. The trial was stopped early after a prespecified interim safety analysis that occurred after a quarter of the participants had been accrued revealed significantly longer event-free survival with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib than with standard of care. After a median follow-up of 18·6 months (IQR 14·6–23·1), significantly more patients receiving neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib were alive without disease progression than those receiving standard of care (ten [71%] of 14 patients vs none of seven in the standard of care group; median event-free survival was 19·7 months [16·2–not estimable] vs 2·9 months [95% CI 1·7–not estimable]; hazard ratio 0·016, 95% CI 0·00012–0·14, p<0·0001). Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib were well tolerated with no occurrence of grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths. The most common adverse events in the neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib group were expected grade 1–2 toxicities including chills (12 patients [92%]), headache (12 [92%]), and pyrexia (ten [77%]). The most common grade 3 adverse event was diarrhoea (two patients [15%]). Interpretation: Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib significantly improved event-free survival versus standard of care in patients with high-risk, surgically resectable, clinical stage III–IV melanoma. Although the trial finished early, limiting generalisability of the results, the findings provide proof-of-concept and support the rationale for further investigation of neoadjuvant approaches in this disease. This trial is currently continuing accrual as a single-arm study of neoadjuvant plus adjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib. Funding: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040535838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040535838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30015-9
DO - 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30015-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 29361468
AN - SCOPUS:85040535838
SN - 1470-2045
VL - 19
SP - 181
EP - 193
JO - The Lancet Oncology
JF - The Lancet Oncology
IS - 2
ER -