TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular Subtyping of Clinically Localized Urothelial Carcinoma Reveals Lower Rates of Pathological Upstaging at Radical Cystectomy Among Luminal Tumors
AU - Lotan, Yair
AU - Boorjian, Stephen A.
AU - Zhang, Jingbin
AU - Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
AU - Porten, Sima P.
AU - Wheeler, Thomas
AU - Lerner, Seth P.
AU - Hutchinson, Ryan
AU - Francis, Franto
AU - Davicioni, Elai
AU - Svatek, Robert S.
AU - Chen, Chun Liang
AU - Black, Peter C.
AU - Gibb, Ewan A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: The original gene expression analysis of the patient tissue was funded by GenomeDx Inc.
Funding Information:
Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: The original gene expression analysis of the patient tissue was funded by GenomeDx Inc .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Association of Urology
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Background: Upstaging of clinical T1-T2 urothelial carcinoma (UC) to non-organ-confined (NOC) pathological stage ≥T3 or N+ at radical cystectomy (RC) is common. Tools for stratifying patients who may have NOC disease are limited. Objective: To determine an association of a genomic subtyping classifier (GSC) with pathological upstaging in multi-institutional cohort of patients with cT1-T2 UC treated with RC. Design, setting, and participants: Precystectomy transurethral specimens from 206 patients with high-grade, cT1-T2, N0M0 UC, who underwent RC without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent GSC testing. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated GSC for upstaging, defined as pT3/T4 and/or pTanyN1–3 disease at RC. Results and limitations: Pathological upstaging occurred in 23% of cT1 and 57% of cT2 cases. Lower rates of upstaging to NOC was seen for luminal versus nonluminal tumors (34% vs 51%, p = 0.02). The differences in upstaging were confined to T stage, with no difference in node positivity for luminal versus nonluminal patients (cT1: 13% for both [p > 0.9], cT2: 15% and 23% [p = 0.6], respectively). Fewer patients with luminal tumors were upstaged to ≥pT3Nany compared with nonluminal tumors (Mantel-Haenszel p = 0.002; cT1: 13% vs 30%, cT2: 34% vs 58%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, nonluminal patients were more likely to be upstaged to ≥pT3 at RC (p < 0.001). Limitations include retrospective design and sample size. Conclusions: Molecular subtyping of clinically localized UC demonstrated that luminal tumors have lower rates of upstaging to non-organ-confined disease compared with nonluminal tumors. If validated, these data can help inform which patients may need multimodal therapy. Patient summary: Determining whether bladder cancer has spread beyond the bladder is challenging at diagnosis. In this paper, genomics helped identify patients who were more likely to have aggressive disease that has spread outside the bladder. These patients may benefit from chemotherapy prior to surgery. Upstaging of bladder cancer from precystectomy clinical stage ≤T2 to non-organ-confined (NOC) pathological stage ≥T3 or N+ at radical cystectomy is common. Molecular subtyping determined that luminal tumors have lower rates of upstaging to NOC disease than nonluminal tumors.
AB - Background: Upstaging of clinical T1-T2 urothelial carcinoma (UC) to non-organ-confined (NOC) pathological stage ≥T3 or N+ at radical cystectomy (RC) is common. Tools for stratifying patients who may have NOC disease are limited. Objective: To determine an association of a genomic subtyping classifier (GSC) with pathological upstaging in multi-institutional cohort of patients with cT1-T2 UC treated with RC. Design, setting, and participants: Precystectomy transurethral specimens from 206 patients with high-grade, cT1-T2, N0M0 UC, who underwent RC without neoadjuvant chemotherapy, underwent GSC testing. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses evaluated GSC for upstaging, defined as pT3/T4 and/or pTanyN1–3 disease at RC. Results and limitations: Pathological upstaging occurred in 23% of cT1 and 57% of cT2 cases. Lower rates of upstaging to NOC was seen for luminal versus nonluminal tumors (34% vs 51%, p = 0.02). The differences in upstaging were confined to T stage, with no difference in node positivity for luminal versus nonluminal patients (cT1: 13% for both [p > 0.9], cT2: 15% and 23% [p = 0.6], respectively). Fewer patients with luminal tumors were upstaged to ≥pT3Nany compared with nonluminal tumors (Mantel-Haenszel p = 0.002; cT1: 13% vs 30%, cT2: 34% vs 58%). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, nonluminal patients were more likely to be upstaged to ≥pT3 at RC (p < 0.001). Limitations include retrospective design and sample size. Conclusions: Molecular subtyping of clinically localized UC demonstrated that luminal tumors have lower rates of upstaging to non-organ-confined disease compared with nonluminal tumors. If validated, these data can help inform which patients may need multimodal therapy. Patient summary: Determining whether bladder cancer has spread beyond the bladder is challenging at diagnosis. In this paper, genomics helped identify patients who were more likely to have aggressive disease that has spread outside the bladder. These patients may benefit from chemotherapy prior to surgery. Upstaging of bladder cancer from precystectomy clinical stage ≤T2 to non-organ-confined (NOC) pathological stage ≥T3 or N+ at radical cystectomy is common. Molecular subtyping determined that luminal tumors have lower rates of upstaging to NOC disease than nonluminal tumors.
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Clinical staging
KW - Gene expression analysis
KW - Molecular subtypes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065413325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065413325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.036
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 31092337
AN - SCOPUS:85065413325
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 76
SP - 200
EP - 206
JO - European urology
JF - European urology
IS - 2
ER -