TY - JOUR
T1 - Modernizing clinical trial eligibility criteria
T2 - Recommendations of the ASCO-friends of cancer research laboratory reference ranges and testing intervals work group
AU - Spira, Alexander I.
AU - Stewart, Mark D.
AU - Jones, Suzanne
AU - Chang, Elaine
AU - Fielding, Anitra
AU - Richie, Nicole
AU - Wood, Laura S.
AU - Thompson, Michael A.
AU - Jones, Lee
AU - Nair, Abhilasha
AU - Mahal, Brandon A.
AU - Gerber, David E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The working group thanks the ASCO-Friends project planning group for its guidance throughout the development of its consensus recommendations and article. Finally, the planning group thanks the 2018–2019 ASCO Cancer Research Committee and Health Equity Committee members for their leadership. D.E. Gerber was supported, in part, by an NCI Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (K24 CA201543-01).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Purpose: In clinical research, eligibility criteria promote patient safety and optimize the evidence generated from clinical trials. However, overly stringent eligibility criteria, including laboratory requirements, may limit enrollment, resulting in delayed trial completion and potentially limiting applicability of trial results to a general practice population. Experimental Design: Starting in 2018, a working group consisting of experts in direct patient care, the FDA, industry, and patient advocacy developed recommendations to guide the optimal use of laboratory reference ranges and testing intervals in clinical trial eligibility criteria and study procedures. The working group evaluated current eligibility criteria across different clinical trial phases and performed a literature review to evaluate the impact of and justification for laboratory test eligibility requirements and testing intervals in clinical trials. Recommendations were developed on the basis of the goals of promoting safety and optimizing the evidence generated, while also expanding eligibility and applicability, and minimizing excess burden of trial participation. Results: In general, we found little variation over time and trial phase in laboratory test requirements, suggesting that these eligibility criteria are not refined according to ongoing clinical experience. We propose recommendations to optimize the use of laboratory tests when considering eligibility criteria. Conclusions: Tailoring the use of laboratory test requirements and testing intervals may increase the number and diversity of patients in clinical trials and provide clinical data that more closely represent the general practice populations.
AB - Purpose: In clinical research, eligibility criteria promote patient safety and optimize the evidence generated from clinical trials. However, overly stringent eligibility criteria, including laboratory requirements, may limit enrollment, resulting in delayed trial completion and potentially limiting applicability of trial results to a general practice population. Experimental Design: Starting in 2018, a working group consisting of experts in direct patient care, the FDA, industry, and patient advocacy developed recommendations to guide the optimal use of laboratory reference ranges and testing intervals in clinical trial eligibility criteria and study procedures. The working group evaluated current eligibility criteria across different clinical trial phases and performed a literature review to evaluate the impact of and justification for laboratory test eligibility requirements and testing intervals in clinical trials. Recommendations were developed on the basis of the goals of promoting safety and optimizing the evidence generated, while also expanding eligibility and applicability, and minimizing excess burden of trial participation. Results: In general, we found little variation over time and trial phase in laboratory test requirements, suggesting that these eligibility criteria are not refined according to ongoing clinical experience. We propose recommendations to optimize the use of laboratory tests when considering eligibility criteria. Conclusions: Tailoring the use of laboratory test requirements and testing intervals may increase the number and diversity of patients in clinical trials and provide clinical data that more closely represent the general practice populations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105332280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85105332280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3853
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3853
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33563636
AN - SCOPUS:85105332280
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 27
SP - 2416
EP - 2423
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 9
ER -