TY - JOUR
T1 - Meta-analysis of speech recognition outcomes in younger and older adults with cochlear implants
AU - Schafer, Erin C.
AU - Miller, Sharon
AU - Manning, Jacy
AU - Zhang, Qi
AU - Lavi, Alexandra
AU - Bodish, Emily
AU - Fuentes, Andrea
AU - De Blaey, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Purpose: Meta-analyses were conducted to compare pre-to postoperative speech recognition improvements and postoperative scores after cochlear implantation in younger (< 60 years) and older (> 60 years) adults. Method: Studies were identified with electronic databases and through manual search of the literature. In the primary analyses, effect sizes between pre-and postoperative scores for each age group were calculated using a formula appropriate for repeated-measures designs. Using the effect sizes, two separate meta-analyses using a random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model were conducted for experiments using word and sentence recognition stimuli in quiet. Secondary meta-analyses were conducted to examine average postimplant, percent correct word recognition, sentence recognition, and speech recognition in noise in studies that included both older and younger age groups. Traditional Hedges’s g effect sizes were calculated between the two groups. Results: For the primary analyses, experiments using word and sentence recognition stimuli yielded significant, large effect sizes for the younger and older adult cochlear implant recipients with no significant differences between the older and younger age groups. However, the secondary meta-analyses of postoperative scores suggested significant differences between age groups for stimuli in quiet and noise. Conclusions: Although older and younger adults with implants achieve the same magnitude of pre-to postimplant speech recognition benefit in quiet, the overall postoperative speech recognition outcomes in quiet and noise are superior in younger over older adults. Strategies to mitigate these group differences are critical for ensuring optimal outcomes in elderly individuals who are candidates for cochlear implants.
AB - Purpose: Meta-analyses were conducted to compare pre-to postoperative speech recognition improvements and postoperative scores after cochlear implantation in younger (< 60 years) and older (> 60 years) adults. Method: Studies were identified with electronic databases and through manual search of the literature. In the primary analyses, effect sizes between pre-and postoperative scores for each age group were calculated using a formula appropriate for repeated-measures designs. Using the effect sizes, two separate meta-analyses using a random-effects restricted maximum likelihood model were conducted for experiments using word and sentence recognition stimuli in quiet. Secondary meta-analyses were conducted to examine average postimplant, percent correct word recognition, sentence recognition, and speech recognition in noise in studies that included both older and younger age groups. Traditional Hedges’s g effect sizes were calculated between the two groups. Results: For the primary analyses, experiments using word and sentence recognition stimuli yielded significant, large effect sizes for the younger and older adult cochlear implant recipients with no significant differences between the older and younger age groups. However, the secondary meta-analyses of postoperative scores suggested significant differences between age groups for stimuli in quiet and noise. Conclusions: Although older and younger adults with implants achieve the same magnitude of pre-to postimplant speech recognition benefit in quiet, the overall postoperative speech recognition outcomes in quiet and noise are superior in younger over older adults. Strategies to mitigate these group differences are critical for ensuring optimal outcomes in elderly individuals who are candidates for cochlear implants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115337396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115337396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00141
DO - 10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00141
M3 - Article
C2 - 34106734
AN - SCOPUS:85115337396
SN - 1059-0889
VL - 30
SP - 481
EP - 496
JO - American Journal of Audiology
JF - American Journal of Audiology
IS - 3
ER -