Margin marking before colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection and its impact on neoplasia recurrence (with video)

Dennis Yang, Peter V. Draganov, William King, Nanlong Liu, Ahmed Sarheed, Adnan Bhat, Peter Jiang, Michael Ladna, Nicole C. Ruiz, Jake Wilson, Venkata S. Gorrepati, Heiko Pohl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Aims: Ablation of resection margins after EMR of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps decreases recurrence. Margin marking before EMR (EMR-MM) may represent an alternative method to achieve a healthy resection margin. We aimed to determine the efficacy of EMR-MM in reducing neoplasia recurrence. Methods: We conducted a single-center historical control study of EMR cases (EMR-MM vs conventional EMR) for nonpedunculated polyps ≥20 mm between 2016 and 2021. For EMR-MM, cautery marks were placed along the lateral margins of the polyp with the snare tip. EMR was then performed to include resection of the healthy mucosa containing the marks. We compared recurrence at surveillance colonoscopy after EMR-MM versus historical control subjects. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with recurrence. Results: Two hundred ten patients with 210 polyps (median size, 30 mm; interquartile range: 25-40) underwent EMR-MM (n = 74) or conventional EMR (n = 136). Patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. At a median follow-up of 6 months, the recurrence rate was lower with EMR-MM (6/74; 8%) compared with historical control subjects (39/136; 29%) (P < .001). EMR-MM was not associated with an increased rate of adverse events. On multivariable analysis, EMR-MM remained the strongest predictor of recurrence (odds ratio, .20; 95% confidence interval, .13-.64; P = .003) aside from polyp size (odds ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-6.01; P = .008). Conclusions: In this single-center historical control study, EMR-MM of large nonpedunculated colorectal polyps reduced the recurrence risk by 80% when compared with conventional EMR. This simple technique may provide an alternative to margin ablation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)956-965
Number of pages10
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume95
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Margin marking before colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection and its impact on neoplasia recurrence (with video)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this