Magnetic resonance imaging improves specificity of placenta accreta spectrum requiring hysterectomy compared to ultrasound

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging has been used increasingly as an adjunct for ultrasound imaging for placenta accreta spectrum assessment and preoperative surgical planning, but its value has not been established yet. The ultrasound-based placenta accreta index is a well-validated standardized approach for placenta accreta spectrum evaluation. Placenta accreta spectrum–magnetic resonance imaging markers have been outlined in a joint guideline from the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare placenta accreta spectrum–magnetic resonance imaging parameters with the ultrasound-based placenta accreta index in pregnancies at high risk for placenta accreta spectrum and to assess the additional diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging for placenta accreta spectrum that requires a cesarean hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective study of pregnant patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging, in addition to ultrasonography, because of suspected placenta accreta spectrum. The ultrasound-based placenta accreta index and placenta accreta spectrum–magnetic resonance imaging parameters were obtained. Student's t test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare the groups in terms of the primary outcome (hysterectomy vs no hysterectomy). The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and the ultrasound-based placenta accreta index was assessed using multivariable logistic regressions, receiver operating characteristics curves, the DeLong test, McNemar test, and the relative predictive value test. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included in the study, 41 of whom required a hysterectomy. All patients who underwent a hysterectomy met the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics clinical evidence of placenta accreta spectrum at the time of delivery. Multiple parameters of the ultrasound-based placenta accreta index and placenta accreta spectrum-magnetic resonance imaging were able to predict hysterectomy, and the parameter of greatest dimension of invasion by magnetic resonance imaging was the best quantitative predictor. At 96% sensitivity for hysterectomy, the cutoff values were 3.5 for the ultrasound-based placenta accreta index and 2.5 cm for the greatest dimension of invasion by magnetic resonance imaging. Using this sensitivity, the parameter of greatest dimension of invasion measured by magnetic resonance imaging had higher specificity (P=.0016) and a higher positive predictive value (P=.0018) than the ultrasound-based placenta accreta index, indicating an improved diagnostic threshold. CONCLUSION: In a suspected high-risk group for placenta accreta spectrum, magnetic resonance imaging identified more patients who will not need a hysterectomy than when using the ultrasound-based placenta accrete index only. Magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to aid patient counseling, surgical planning, and delivery timing, including preterm delivery decisions for patients with placenta accreta spectrum requiring hysterectomy.