TY - JOUR
T1 - Levetiracetam Pregnancy Registry
T2 - Final results and a review of the impact of registry methodology and definitions on the prevalence of major congenital malformations
AU - Scheuerle, Angela E.
AU - Holmes, Lewis B.
AU - Albano, Jessica D.
AU - Badalamenti, Vincent
AU - Battino, Dina
AU - Covington, Deborah
AU - Harden, Cynthia
AU - Miller, David
AU - Montouris, Georgia D.
AU - Pantaleoni, Chiara
AU - Thorp, John
AU - Tofighy, Azita
AU - Tomson, Torbjörn
AU - Golembesky, Amanda K.
N1 - Funding Information:
V.B. and D.M. are employees of UCB Pharma. A.K.G. is a former employee of UCB Pharma, currently based in Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany. D.C., C.H., G.M., A.E.S., and J.T. are paid consultants to the Levetiracetam Pregnancy Registry. J.D.A. is an employee of Syneos Health (previously INC Research), the coordinating center for the LEV-Registry responsible for the daily operations and statistical analysis. L.B.H. receives salary support from funds provided by the Sponsors and Contributors to the North American AED Pregnancy Registry to the Massachusetts General Hospital. T.T. has received speaker's honoraria to his institution from Eisai, BMJ India, Livanova, Sandoz, UCB Pharma, and Actavis; honoraria to his institution for advisory boards from UCB Pharma and Eisai; and research support from Stockholm County Council, CURE, GlaxoSmithKline, UCB Pharma, Eisai, Bial, and Novartis. A.T. received funding by UCB Pharma for providing writing support. D.B. and C.P. report no conflicts of interest.
Funding Information:
The authors express their deep gratitude to the women who participated in this study, and their healthcare providers. They also express their deep gratitude to Professor Sonia Hern?ndez-D?az, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston MA, USA for reviewing the results, and the manuscript. The authors acknowledge the contribution of Barbara Pelgrims, UCB Pharma, in overseeing the development of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/8
Y1 - 2019/8
N2 - Background: To evaluate pregnancy outcomes among women participating in the antiepileptic drug (AED) Levetiracetam Registry (LEV-Registry), and to review the impact of using two other registries' outcome definitions on the number of major congenital malformations (MCMs). Methods: This US-based prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00345475) was overseen by an independent Expert Panel. Women exposed to levetiracetam at any time during pregnancy enrolled, directly, or via their healthcare provider. The primary outcome was prevalence of MCMs, defined according to a modified version of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program criteria. Results: Of 491 women enrolled, 465 (94.7%) had a documented outcome. Most (92.3%) received levetiracetam for epilepsy; 323 (69.4%) as monotherapy and 142 (30.5%) as polytherapy. With three twin pregnancies, there were 468 outcomes—444 livebirths, 3 stillbirths, 19 miscarriages, and 2 terminations. Based on the MCM definition used by LEV-Registry, 46 infants among 444 livebirths had MCMs resulting in 10.4% (95% CI 7.7, 13.6) for overall prevalence, 9.4% (95% CI 6.4, 13.2) with monotherapy, and 12.6% (95% CI 7.5, 19.4) with polytherapy. When MCM reports were reviewed independently by staff at EURAP (International Registry of AEDs) and North American AED Pregnancy Registry according to their respective criteria, only 22 and 7 infants of the 46, respectively, were classified as having MCMs. Conclusion: The LEV-Registry Expert Panel did not find evidence suggestive of teratogenic association with prenatal exposure to levetiracetam. The substantial differences in which physical findings were considered MCMs highlight the major impact of pregnancy registry methodology on MCM prevalence estimates.
AB - Background: To evaluate pregnancy outcomes among women participating in the antiepileptic drug (AED) Levetiracetam Registry (LEV-Registry), and to review the impact of using two other registries' outcome definitions on the number of major congenital malformations (MCMs). Methods: This US-based prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00345475) was overseen by an independent Expert Panel. Women exposed to levetiracetam at any time during pregnancy enrolled, directly, or via their healthcare provider. The primary outcome was prevalence of MCMs, defined according to a modified version of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program criteria. Results: Of 491 women enrolled, 465 (94.7%) had a documented outcome. Most (92.3%) received levetiracetam for epilepsy; 323 (69.4%) as monotherapy and 142 (30.5%) as polytherapy. With three twin pregnancies, there were 468 outcomes—444 livebirths, 3 stillbirths, 19 miscarriages, and 2 terminations. Based on the MCM definition used by LEV-Registry, 46 infants among 444 livebirths had MCMs resulting in 10.4% (95% CI 7.7, 13.6) for overall prevalence, 9.4% (95% CI 6.4, 13.2) with monotherapy, and 12.6% (95% CI 7.5, 19.4) with polytherapy. When MCM reports were reviewed independently by staff at EURAP (International Registry of AEDs) and North American AED Pregnancy Registry according to their respective criteria, only 22 and 7 infants of the 46, respectively, were classified as having MCMs. Conclusion: The LEV-Registry Expert Panel did not find evidence suggestive of teratogenic association with prenatal exposure to levetiracetam. The substantial differences in which physical findings were considered MCMs highlight the major impact of pregnancy registry methodology on MCM prevalence estimates.
KW - antiepileptic drug
KW - birth defects
KW - congenital anomalies
KW - epilepsy
KW - teratogenicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066890045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066890045&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bdr2.1526
DO - 10.1002/bdr2.1526
M3 - Article
C2 - 31124321
AN - SCOPUS:85066890045
SN - 2472-1727
VL - 111
SP - 872
EP - 887
JO - Birth Defects Research
JF - Birth Defects Research
IS - 13
ER -