Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Is it feasible and reasonable?

Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Louis R. Kavoussi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations


Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an extremely challenging procedure for even experienced laparoscopic surgeons, and it is not practical to expect most urologists to learn the technique. Nevertheless, it is a feasible procedure and has short-term results comparable with conventional radical prostatectomy. For LRP to be an acceptable and reasonable alternative, the oncologic results must be equivalent to the results of RRP, and significant advantages in morbidity (hospital stay, pain, incontinence, impotence) must be attained; otherwise, the steep learning curve and the additional expense of the procedure make it difficult to justify as an alternative therapeutic modality. Beside a reduction in the transfusion rate, no other significant advantages of LRP over radical prostatectomy have been demonstrated definitively to date. As a result, the role of LRP in the management of prostate cancer remains investigational, and patients should be informed appropriately. The oncologic results and low morbidity of nerve-sparing RRP set a high standard for a laparoscopic technique to equal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-661
Number of pages7
JournalUrologic Clinics of North America
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Is it feasible and reasonable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this