Is there a role for secondary debulking in ovarian cancer? A review of the current literature

Danielle Krause, Debra L. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose of reviewUntil recently, no data was available from randomized, controlled trials (RCT) to assess the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the management of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. This review highlights results from the three completed RCTs, and other recent literature on this topic.Recent findingsBoth the AGO and iMODEL criteria predict high rates of complete gross resection at the time of secondary CRS. Overall survival (OS) was improved in the surgical arms in both DESKTOP 3 and SOC-1. In contrast, surgery did not improve OS in GOG 213, but greater than 80% of patients received bevacizumab with chemotherapy in GOG 213.SummarySecondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer can be considered in patients who meet specific criteria. Available data supports improvement in OS for patients not receiving bevacizumab, who achieve complete gross resection. Surgery is harmful to patients with gross residual disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-5
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer
  • recurrent ovarian cancer
  • secondary surgical cytoreduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a role for secondary debulking in ovarian cancer? A review of the current literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this