TY - JOUR
T1 - Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Calcified Coronary Lesions
AU - Karacsonyi, Judit
AU - Allana, Salman S.
AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
AU - Sandoval, Yader
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Purpose of review: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool for calcified lesion modification using acoustic pressure waves. In this review, we discuss its use to treat calcified coronary lesions, including technique, mechanism of action, clinical practice, current evidence, advantages and disadvantages, and its role in specific lesion subsets. Recent findings: Prospective studies, the “Shockwave Coronary Rx Lithoplasty® Study” Disrupt CAD I, II, and III have demonstrated that IVL is safe and effective to prepare calcific stenotic lesions for stent deployment. Summary: IVL is a novel, facile technology to modify coronary calcification that is associated with a low risk for intra-procedural complications. It can be used upfront or as a bailout in combination with other modalities for calcium modification. While it is easier to use than other atherectomy devices, there are no robust comparative data on outcomes or cost-effectiveness. Further studies are needed to define its role in specific complex lesions.
AB - Purpose of review: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool for calcified lesion modification using acoustic pressure waves. In this review, we discuss its use to treat calcified coronary lesions, including technique, mechanism of action, clinical practice, current evidence, advantages and disadvantages, and its role in specific lesion subsets. Recent findings: Prospective studies, the “Shockwave Coronary Rx Lithoplasty® Study” Disrupt CAD I, II, and III have demonstrated that IVL is safe and effective to prepare calcific stenotic lesions for stent deployment. Summary: IVL is a novel, facile technology to modify coronary calcification that is associated with a low risk for intra-procedural complications. It can be used upfront or as a bailout in combination with other modalities for calcium modification. While it is easier to use than other atherectomy devices, there are no robust comparative data on outcomes or cost-effectiveness. Further studies are needed to define its role in specific complex lesions.
KW - Calcification
KW - Intravascular lithotripsy
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160826979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160826979&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11936-023-00985-6
DO - 10.1007/s11936-023-00985-6
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85160826979
SN - 1092-8464
VL - 25
SP - 189
EP - 203
JO - Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine
IS - 7
ER -