TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer treated with systemic neoadjuvant therapy
AU - Huerta-Rosario, Mariela
AU - Mir, Mariam
AU - Quispe-Vicuña, Carlos
AU - Hwang, Helena
AU - Sarode, Venetia
AU - Peng, Yan
AU - Fang, Yisheng
AU - Leitch, Marilyn
AU - Sahoo, Sunati
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Aims: Touch preparation (TP) and frozen section (FS) are the two methods routinely used in the intraoperative evaluation (IOE) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to detect metastases in patients with breast cancer. Both methods are extremely sensitive and specific in the primary surgery (non-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (non-NST)) setting. Since NST introduces unique challenges in the IOE of SLNs, the aim was to determine the accuracy of TP and FS in the IOE of SLNs in the NST setting and compare the results with the non-NST setting and to examine factors that contribute to any differences. Methods: We analysed 871 SLNs from 232 patients (615 SLNs from NST and 256 SLNs from non-NST settings) between 2016 through 2019. Results: In the NST group, TP alone (n=366) had a sensitivity of 45.7% and specificity of 99.7%; FS alone (n=90) had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 100%. When both TP and FS (n=135) were used, the sensitivity was 80.3% and the specificity was 98.6%. In the non-NST group, TP alone (n=193) had a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 100%; FS alone (n=22) had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%; and combined TP and FS (n=34) had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: Evaluating SLNs intraoperatively in the NST setting can be challenging secondary to therapy-related changes. In the NST setting, FS has higher sensitivity and specificity compared with TP for the IOE of SLNs and should be the preferred method.
AB - Aims: Touch preparation (TP) and frozen section (FS) are the two methods routinely used in the intraoperative evaluation (IOE) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) to detect metastases in patients with breast cancer. Both methods are extremely sensitive and specific in the primary surgery (non-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (non-NST)) setting. Since NST introduces unique challenges in the IOE of SLNs, the aim was to determine the accuracy of TP and FS in the IOE of SLNs in the NST setting and compare the results with the non-NST setting and to examine factors that contribute to any differences. Methods: We analysed 871 SLNs from 232 patients (615 SLNs from NST and 256 SLNs from non-NST settings) between 2016 through 2019. Results: In the NST group, TP alone (n=366) had a sensitivity of 45.7% and specificity of 99.7%; FS alone (n=90) had a sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 100%. When both TP and FS (n=135) were used, the sensitivity was 80.3% and the specificity was 98.6%. In the non-NST group, TP alone (n=193) had a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 100%; FS alone (n=22) had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%; and combined TP and FS (n=34) had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 96%, respectively. Conclusions: Evaluating SLNs intraoperatively in the NST setting can be challenging secondary to therapy-related changes. In the NST setting, FS has higher sensitivity and specificity compared with TP for the IOE of SLNs and should be the preferred method.
KW - Breast Neoplasms
KW - Neoplasm Metastasis
KW - Sentinel Lymph Node
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164379834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164379834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jcp-2023-208862
DO - 10.1136/jcp-2023-208862
M3 - Article
C2 - 37258252
AN - SCOPUS:85164379834
SN - 0021-9746
JO - Journal of clinical pathology
JF - Journal of clinical pathology
M1 - jcp-2023-208862
ER -