TY - JOUR
T1 - Intraoperative aneurysmal rupture
T2 - Incidence, outcome, and suggestions for surgical management
AU - Batjer, H.
AU - Samson, D.
PY - 1986/1/1
Y1 - 1986/1/1
N2 - Intraoperative rupture of an intracranial arterial aneurysm can dramatically interrupt a deliberate microsurgical procedure and jeopardize the patient's changes for a favorable outcome. Intraoperative rupture occurred in 58 of 307 (19%) consecutive aneurysm procedures done at The University of Texas Health Science Center. Rupture occurred during three specific periods: early or predissection in 7%, dissection in 48%, and clip application in 45%. Outcome after rupture during the predissection interval was poor, with only 1 of 4 patients surviving. Aneurysmal rupture during dissection could be attributed to blunt dissection techniques in 75% of the cases and to sharp subarachnoid dissection in 25%. The outcome was favorable in only 50% of the patients sustaining blunt dissection errors, whereas all patients sustaining intraoperative rupture during sharp dissection recovered well. Rupture during clip application was attributed to incomplete dissection in 65%, poor clip application in 31%, and a mechanical clip failure in 1 case. Eighty-eight per cent of patients who underwent uneventful operative procedures had favorable outcomes, whereas only 62% of the patients suffering intraoperative rupture recovered well. The use of sharp microsurgical techniques with a systematic contingency plan for dealing with sudden hemorrhage and the judicious use of temporary clips should minimize the adverse effect of intraoperative rupture on overall management morbidity and mortality.
AB - Intraoperative rupture of an intracranial arterial aneurysm can dramatically interrupt a deliberate microsurgical procedure and jeopardize the patient's changes for a favorable outcome. Intraoperative rupture occurred in 58 of 307 (19%) consecutive aneurysm procedures done at The University of Texas Health Science Center. Rupture occurred during three specific periods: early or predissection in 7%, dissection in 48%, and clip application in 45%. Outcome after rupture during the predissection interval was poor, with only 1 of 4 patients surviving. Aneurysmal rupture during dissection could be attributed to blunt dissection techniques in 75% of the cases and to sharp subarachnoid dissection in 25%. The outcome was favorable in only 50% of the patients sustaining blunt dissection errors, whereas all patients sustaining intraoperative rupture during sharp dissection recovered well. Rupture during clip application was attributed to incomplete dissection in 65%, poor clip application in 31%, and a mechanical clip failure in 1 case. Eighty-eight per cent of patients who underwent uneventful operative procedures had favorable outcomes, whereas only 62% of the patients suffering intraoperative rupture recovered well. The use of sharp microsurgical techniques with a systematic contingency plan for dealing with sudden hemorrhage and the judicious use of temporary clips should minimize the adverse effect of intraoperative rupture on overall management morbidity and mortality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022460770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022460770&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1227/00006123-198606000-00004
DO - 10.1227/00006123-198606000-00004
M3 - Article
C2 - 3736796
AN - SCOPUS:0022460770
SN - 0148-396X
VL - 18
SP - 701
EP - 707
JO - Neurosurgery
JF - Neurosurgery
IS - 6
ER -