International Survey of Operative Practices for Otologists and Neurotologists during the COVID-19 Crisis

Sarah E. Ridge, Divya A. Chari, Elliott D. Kozin, Aaron K. Remenschneider, Oliver F. Adunka, Miguel Aristegui, Wai Tsz Chang, Yen Fu Cheng, Jong Woo Chung, Michael S. Cohen, Matthew G. Crowson, Justin S. Golub, Ophir Handzel, Brandon Isaacson, Arunachalam Iyer, Seiji Kakehata, Daniele Marchioni, João Flávio Nogueira, Nirmal Patel, Alicia M. QuesnelAlejandro Rivas, Shakeel R. Saeed, Richard Salzman, Felipe Santos, Alexander J. Saxby, Muaaz Tarabichi, Nicolas Verhaert, Robert Vincent, George Wanna, Stephan Wolpert, Daniel J. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


Objective:To investigate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on operative practices of otology and neurotology providers internationally.Study Design:Cross-sectional survey.Methods:A 78-question survey was distributed to otologists and neurotologists between May 12, 2020 and June 8, 2020 to assess the impact of the pandemic on surgical practices. Sections within the survey delineated time periods: prior to the crisis, onset of the crisis, during the crisis, postcrisis transition.Results:Of 396 survey respondents, 284 participants from 38 countries met inclusion criteria.Respondents were 16.9% female and 82.4% male, with a most common age range of 40 to 49 years (36.3%). 69.8% of participants had been in practice for over 10 years and most respondents worked in an academic medical center (79.2%). The average operative weekly caseload was 5.3 (SD 3.9) per surgeon prior to the crisis, 0.7 (SD 1.2) during the COVID-19 crisis, and 3.5 (SD 3.3) for those who had begun a postcrisis transition at the time of survey administration (p < 0.001). 71.5% of providers did not perform an elective otologic or neurotologic operative procedure during the initial crisis period. 49.8% reported modifying their surgical technique due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Use of powered air-purifying respirators and filtering facepiece 2 or 3 (FFP2/FFP3) respirators were in minimal supply for 66.9% and 62.3% of respondents, respectively.Conclusion:The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the otology and neurotology community globally, resulting in significant changes in operative volume and case selection. Modification of surgical technique and shortages of personal protective equipment were frequently reported.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1275-1284
Number of pages10
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Issue number8
StatePublished - Sep 1 2021
Externally publishedYes


  • Aerosol generating procedure
  • Coronavirus
  • Endoscope
  • Exoscope
  • Mastoidectomy
  • N95
  • Neurotologic surgery
  • Otologic surgery
  • PAPR
  • PPE
  • Pandemic
  • Personal protective equipment
  • SARS CoV-2
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology


Dive into the research topics of 'International Survey of Operative Practices for Otologists and Neurotologists during the COVID-19 Crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this