Integrative comparative cognition: Can neurobiology and neurogenomics inform comparative analyses of cognitive phenotype?

Sabrina S. Burmeister, Yuxiang Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A long-standing question in animal behavior is what are the patterns and processes that shape the evolution of cognition? One effective way to address this question is to study cognitive abilities in a broad spectrum of animals. While comparative psychologists have traditionally focused on a narrow range of organisms, today they may work with any number of species, from frogs to birds or bees. This broader range of study species has greatly enriched our understanding of the diversity of cognitive processes among animals. Yet, this diversity has highlighted the fundamental challenge of comparing cognitive processes across animals. An analysis of the neural and molecular mechanisms of cognition may be necessary to solve this problem. The goal of our symposium was to bring together speakers studying a range of species to gain a broadly integrative perspective on cognition while at the same time considering the potentially important role of neurobiology and genomics in addressing the difficult problem of comparing cognition across species. For example, work by MaBouDi et al. indicates that neural constraints on computing power may impact the cognitive processes underlying numerical discrimination in bees. A presentation by Lara LaDage demonstrated how neurobiology can be used to better understand cognition and its evolution in reptiles while Edwards et al. identify the cerebellum as potentially important in the performance of the complex process of nest building. We see that molecular approaches highlight the contributions of the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus to cognitive phenotype across vertebrates while, at the same time, identifying the genes and cellular processes that may contribute to evolution of cognition. The potentially important role of neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity emerge clearly from such studies. Still unanswered is the question of whether molecular tools will contribute to our ability to discriminate convergent/parallel evolution from homology in the evolution of cognitive phenotype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)925-928
Number of pages4
JournalIntegrative and Comparative Biology
Volume60
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Plant Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integrative comparative cognition: Can neurobiology and neurogenomics inform comparative analyses of cognitive phenotype?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this